JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Interpretive Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by König, S.
Right arrow Articles by Simianer, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by König, S.
Right arrow Articles by Simianer, H.
J. Dairy Sci. 90:1967-1980. doi:10.3168/jds.2006-473
© American Dairy Science Association, 2007.

Application of Controlling Instruments for Improvements in Cow Sire Selection

S. König1, S. Lessner and H. Simianer

Institute of Animal Breeding and Genetics, University of Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany

1 Corresponding author: skoenig2{at}gwdg.de

National estimated breeding values of bulls from 1998 through 2006 from 12 different German artificial insemination (AI) organizations were used to determine the differences in expected and realized selection intensities for cow sire selection, considering the total merit index as well as subindexes for production, conformation, somatic cell count, fertility, and functional herd life. The expected selection intensity was derived from a Gaussian distribution and from the replacement rate describing the percentage of bulls graduated as cow sires from the total amount of progeny-tested young bulls within the AI organization and by birth year. Realized selection intensities for all indexes were derived from the selection differential of cow sires, defined as the deviation of the average index of selected cow sires from the average index of the total number of progeny-tested young bulls. A low replacement rate of cow sires was associated with relatively high realized selection intensities for the total merit, production, and conformation indexes, but was not related to the somatic cell count, fertility, and functional herd life indexes. The controlling value, defined as the ratio of realized to expected selection intensities, indicates the effectiveness of cow sire selection for different traits. Low controlling values (i.e., low realized selection intensities in combination with moderate or high expected selection intensities) suggest improvements in the step of cow sire selection, especially when discussing the total merit index. Analysis of variance revealed significant differences in expected selection intensities, realized selection intensities, and controlling values for the total merit, production, and conformation indexes between AI organizations and birth years of bulls. Artificial insemination organizations applying well-defined breeding policies (e.g., high controlling values for the total merit index) were successful in the national competition when evaluated according to the national top lists for the respective indexes, regardless of the active population size. The suggested method also allows for comparison of the importance of different indexes in selection decisions. Furthermore, controlling values can monitor additional potential in the improvement of cow sire selection with respect to improvement of the genetic level in the whole population. The development of appropriate selection tools or controlling instruments is of increasing concern for monitoring selection policies in the short term as well as for establishing sustainable breeding policies.

Key Words: breeding program • selection intensity • controlling cow sire selection




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
S. Konig and H. H. Swalve
Application of selection index calculations to determine selection strategies in genomic breeding programs
J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2009; 92(10): 5292 - 5303.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
S. Konig, H. Simianer, and A. Willam
Economic evaluation of genomic breeding programs
J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2009; 92(1): 382 - 391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
S. Konig, Y. M. Chang, U. U. v. Borstel, D. Gianola, and H. Simianer
Genetic and Phenotypic Relationships Among Milk Urea Nitrogen, Fertility, and Milk Yield in Holstein Cows
J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2008; 91(11): 4372 - 4382.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
S. Konig, F. Bosselmann, U. U. von Borstel, and H. Simianer
Genetic Analysis of Traits Affecting the Success of Embryo Transfer in Dairy Cattle
J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2007; 90(8): 3945 - 3954.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.