JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Interpretive Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McCarthy, S.
Right arrow Articles by Horan, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McCarthy, S.
Right arrow Articles by Horan, B.
J. Dairy Sci. 90:1859-1869. doi:10.3168/jds.2006-501
© American Dairy Science Association, 2007.

Influence of Holstein-Friesian Strain and Feed System on Body Weight and Body Condition Score Lactation Profiles

S. McCarthy*,{dagger},1, D. P. Berry*, P. Dillon*, M. Rath{dagger} and B. Horan*,{dagger}

* Teagasc, Dairy Production Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland
{dagger} School of Agriculture, Food Science and Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland

1 Corresponding author: Sean.mccarthy{at}teagasc.ie

The objective of the present study was to determine effects of strain of Holstein-Friesian and feed system on body weight (BW) and body condition score (BCS; scale of 1 to 5) lactation profiles in seasonal-calving, grass-based milk production systems. The 3 strains of Holstein-Friesian compared differed in milk production potential and were high-production North American (HP), high-durability North American (HD), and New Zealand (NZ). The 3 feed systems compared were a high grass allowance feed system typical of spring-calving herds in Ireland (MP); an increased stocking rate system (HS); and an increased concentrate supplementation system (HC), each maintained within a separate farmlet. The data comprised 20,611 weekly BW and 7,920 BCS records assessed every 3 wk across 5 yr on 584 lactations. An exponential function was used to model BW and BCS lactation profiles across feed systems. Across feed systems, the NZ strain was significantly lighter (545 kg) but had greater average BCS (3.10 units) compared with the HP (579.3 kg and 2.76 units, respectively) and HD strains (583.2 kg and 2.87 units, respectively). Across feeding systems, the HD and HP strains exhibited a greater loss of BCS in early lactation (0.27 and 0.29 units, respectively) compared with the NZ strain (0.21 units). The HP strain failed to gain BCS over the entire lactation. Concentrate input did not affect the rate of BCS or BW loss in early lactation or BCS at 60 DIM. This study extends previous research outlining the greater suitability of the NZ strain to the low-cost grass-based system of milk production predominantly operated in Ireland.

Key Words: Holstein-Friesian • body weight • body condition score • pasture




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. R. Roche, N. C. Friggens, J. K. Kay, M. W. Fisher, K. J. Stafford, and D. P. Berry
Invited review: Body condition score and its association with dairy cow productivity, health, and welfare
J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2009; 92(12): 5769 - 5801.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. K. Kay, C. V. C. Phyn, J. R. Roche, and E. S. Kolver
Extending lactation in pasture-based dairy cows. II: Effect of genetic strain and diet on plasma hormone and metabolite concentrations
J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2009; 92(8): 3704 - 3713.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Professional Animal ScientistHome page
J. M. Bewley and M. M. Schutz
Review: An Interdisciplinary Review of Body Condition Scoring for Dairy Cattle
Professional Animal Scientist, December 1, 2008; 24(6): 507 - 529.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.