JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Interpretive Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walsh, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Leslie, K. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Walsh, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Leslie, K. E.
J. Dairy Sci. 90:1139-1148
© American Dairy Science Association, 2007.

Synchronization of Estrus and Pregnancy Risk in Anestrous Dairy Cows After Treatment with a Progesterone-Releasing Intravaginal Device

R. B. Walsh*,1, S. J. LeBlanc*, T. D. Duffield*, D. F. Kelton*, J. S. Walton{dagger} and K. E. Leslie*

* Department of Population Medicine, and
{dagger} Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada, N1G 2W1

1 Corresponding author: rwalsh{at}uoguelph.ca

Lactating Holstein cows (located in 4 dairy herds) that had failed to display estrus as defined by increased pedometer activity by 63 ± 3 d in milk, were enrolled to investigate the effect of a progesterone-releasing intravaginal device (PRID, n = 268) relative to a placebo intravaginal device (PID, control, n = 266) on days from device removal to artificial insemination (AI), the probability of pregnancy at first AI, and days from device removal to pregnancy. Cows were assigned randomly to receive a PRID or PID for 7 d and an injection of PGF2{alpha} at device removal. Upon device removal, a vaginitis score was assigned and AI occurred at observed estrus. Cows failing to display estrus within 14 d of device removal were subjected to a subsequent reproductive exam and were treated with PGF2{alpha}. Two percent of PRID-treated cows and 11% of control cows displayed estrus during the 7-d exposure period. Among the remaining cows, 93% of the devices were present at the scheduled removal. Cows treated with the PRID were 60% less likely to have purulent debris on the device than control cows. Vaginal reaction, however, was not associated with any of the reproductive outcomes. Investigation of the reproductive outcomes revealed a treatment x parity interaction. Progesterone-treated primiparous cows were inseminated 17 d earlier, with no significant change in the probability of pregnancy at first AI (30.3 vs. 42.0%), and no difference in median time from device removal to pregnancy (52 vs. 53 d) relative to control primiparous cows. Conversely, PRID-treated multiparous cows were inseminated 8 d earlier, with no change in probability of pregnancy at first AI (24.6 vs. 18.8%); however, median time from device removal to pregnancy was reduced by 20 d (67 vs. 87 d). These results support the efficacy of a PRID to induce estrus in previously anestrous cows. The reason, however, for the variable response between primiparous and multiparous cows was not clear.

Key Words: progesterone-releasing intravaginal device • synchronization • fertility • time to pregnancy







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.