JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Interpretive Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kaylegian, K. E.
Right arrow Articles by Barbano, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kaylegian, K. E.
Right arrow Articles by Barbano, D. M.
J. Dairy Sci. 90:602-615
© American Dairy Science Association, 2007.

Lipolysis and Proteolysis of Modified and Producer Milks Used for Calibration of Mid-Infrared Milk Analyzers1

K. E. Kaylegian*, J. M. Lynch*, J. R. Fleming{dagger} and D. M. Barbano*,2

* Northeast Dairy Foods Research Center, Department of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
{dagger} USDA, Agricultural Marketing Service, Southwest Milk Marketing Area, Carrollton, TX

2 Corresponding author: dmb37{at}cornell.edu

Our objective was to determine if lipolysis or proteolysis of calibration sets during shelf life influenced the mid-infrared (MIR) readings or calibration slopes and intercepts. The lipolytic and proteolytic deterioration was measured for 3 modified milk and 3 producer milk calibration sets during storage at 4°C. Modified and producer milk sets were used separately to calibrate an optical filter and virtual filter MIR analyzer. The uncorrected readings and slopes and intercepts of the calibration linear regressions for fat B, fat A, protein, and lactose were determined over 28 d for modified milks and 15 d for producer milks. It was expected that increases in free fatty acid content and decreases in the casein as a percentage of true protein of the calibration milks would have an effect on the MIR uncorrected readings, calibration slopes and intercepts, and MIR predicted readings. However, the influence of lipolysis and proteolysis on uncorrected readings was either not significant, or significant but very small. Likewise, the amount of variation accounted for by day of storage at 4°C of a calibration set on the calibration slopes and intercepts was also very small. Most of the variation in uncorrected readings and calibration slopes and intercepts were due to differences between the optical filter and virtual filter analyzers and differences between the pasteurized modified milk and raw producer milk calibration sets, not due to lipolysis or proteolysis. The combined impact of lipolysis and proteolysis on MIR predicted values was <0.01% in most cases.

Key Words: calibration • infrared milk analysis • lipolysis • proteolysis




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
K. E. Kaylegian, J. M. Lynch, J. R. Fleming, and D. M. Barbano
Influence of fatty acid chain length and unsaturation on mid-infrared milk analysis
J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2009; 92(6): 2485 - 2501.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
K. E. Kaylegian, D. A. Dwyer, J. M. Lynch, D. E. Bauman, J. R. Fleming, and D. M. Barbano
Impact of fatty acid composition on the accuracy of mid-infrared fat analysis of farm milks
J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2009; 92(6): 2502 - 2513.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.