JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Dairy Sci. 2007. 90:5580-5586. doi:10.3168/jds.2007-0570
© 2007 American Dairy Science Association ®

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Interpretive Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moody, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Heinrichs, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moody, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Heinrichs, A. J.

Nutrient Utilization of Differing Forage-to-Concentrate Ratios by Growing Holstein Heifers1

M. L. Moody, G. I. Zanton, J. M. Daubert and A. J. Heinrichs2

Department of Dairy and Animal Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park 16802

2 Corresponding author: ajh{at}psu.edu

Traditionally, high-forage, low-concentrate diets fed ad libitum have been the primary system of feeding dairy heifers. However, high-concentrate diets can be fed at restricted intakes to reach desired rates of gain and increase nutrient efficiency. A total mixed ration containing high corn silage (CS; HCS: 77% CS, 23% concentrate) or low CS (LCS: 67% concentrate, 33% CS) was fed at restricted intakes in 2 trials to evaluate nutrient utilization by growing heifers. In the first trial, 4 ruminally cannulated heifers (298 ± 16 kg of body weight) were fed to study differences in rumen pH, volatile fatty acid and ammonia concentrations, and mass of rumen contents. In situ determinations were made on the total mixed ration and CS. Low CS rations were digested more rapidly in situ when compared with HCS (4.5 vs. 2.3 ± 0.3%/h), and no differences were observed in CS digestibility when incubated in the rumen of heifers fed either ration. Mean rumen pH tended to be lower for LCS than for HCS (5.9 vs. 6.2 ± 0.1). Individual and total rumen volatile fatty acid concentrations and rumen ammonia concentration were not different between treatments. Total mass of rumen contents was lower for LCS. In the second trial, four 6-mo-old heifers (172 ± 14 kg of body weight) and four 12-mo-old heifers (337 ± 10 kg of body weight) were used. Digestibility of dry matter was greater for the LCS than the HCS diet in both age groups (76.3 vs. 71.1% for 12-mo-old heifers; 71.4 vs. 68.9% for 6-mo-old heifers). Apparent digestibility of N was not different between treatments; however, retained N was higher for the LCS diets for both age groups. Fecal output was significantly reduced in the LCS diets for both age groups. Feeding low-forage, high-concentrate diets to growing dairy heifers at restricted intakes, although more highly digestible, resulted in few significant differences in rumen fermentation patterns and lower fecal output.

Key Words: dairy heifer • nitrogen digestibility • rumen fermentation • rumen pH




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
G. J. Lascano, G. I. Zanton, F. X. Suarez-Mena, and A. J. Heinrichs
Effect of limit feeding high- and low-concentrate diets with Saccharomyces cerevisiae on digestibility and on dairy heifer growth and first-lactation performance
J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2009; 92(10): 5100 - 5110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Professional Animal ScientistHome page
G. I. Zanton and A. J. Heinrichs
Review: Limit-Feeding with Altered Forage-to-Concentrate Levels in Dairy Heifer Diets
Professional Animal Scientist, August 1, 2009; 25(4): 393 - 403.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
G. I. Zanton and A. J. Heinrichs
Digestion and nitrogen utilization in dairy heifers limit-fed a low or high forage ration at four levels of nitrogen intake
J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2009; 92(5): 2078 - 2094.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
N. C. Berard, R. A. Holley, T. A. McAllister, K. H. Ominski, K. M. Wittenberg, K. S. Bouchard, J. J. Bouchard, and D. O. Krause
Potential To Reduce Escherichia coli Shedding in Cattle Feces by Using Sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) Forage, Tested In Vitro and In Vivo
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., February 15, 2009; 75(4): 1074 - 1079.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
G. J. Lascano, G. I. Zanton, M. L. Moody, P. A. Topper, E. F. Wheeler, and A. J. Heinrichs
Short Communication: Effect of Changing the Ratio of Forage to Concentrate on Ammonia Emissions by Dairy Heifers
J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2008; 91(11): 4301 - 4306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
G. I. Zanton and A. J. Heinrichs
Rumen Digestion and Nutritional Efficiency of Dairy Heifers Limit-Fed a High Forage Ration to Four Levels of Dry Matter Intake
J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2008; 91(9): 3579 - 3588.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.