|
|
||||||||




* Ghent University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Physiology and Biometrics, Salisburylaan 133, B-9820, Merelbeke, Belgium
Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Pathobiology, Section Immunology, 91775-1793, Mashhad, Iran
Department of Animal Sciences, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan 84156, Iran
Department of Animal Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson 85721
1 Corresponding author: Christian.Burvenich{at}UGent.be
To evaluate effects of different dry period lengths on milk yield, milk composition, and energy balance of dairy cows, 122 multiparous and primiparous Holstein dairy cows were used in a completely randomized experimental design with 56-, 42-, and 35-d dry period lengths. Actual dry period lengths for respective treatments (TRT) were 56 ± 5.1 d, 42 ± 2.1 d, and 35 ± 2.7 d. Overall, cows in the 42- and 56-d TRT gained more body condition than those in 35-d TRT during the dry period; however, postpartum body condition score did not change substantially among the TRT. Although from 3 to 210 DIM, differences were not detected in the milk yield of multiparous cows between the 35- and 56-d TRT, primiparous cows in the 35-d TRT produced less milk than those in 56-d TRT. In primiparous cows, the milk production at wk 9, 10, and 11 of lactation was lower in the 35-d compared with the 56-d TRT. Primiparous cows in the 35-d compared with the 56-d TRT produced less milk protein. In the 35-d TRT, serum triglyceride concentration was greater in primiparous cows than in multiparous cows during the peripartum period. Among primiparous cows, those in the 56-d TRT had greater concentrations of nonesterified fatty acids than those in the 35-d TRT during the peripartum period. No significant differences were observed in concentrations of serum glucose, insulin, and insulin-like growth factor-I during early lactation among TRT. There was also no difference among TRT for incidence of metabolic disorders. Thus, this study indicates that shortening the dry period to 35 d may be beneficial in multiparous and overconditioned cows, but not in primiparous cows.
Key Words: dry period metabolic status performance
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. H. Klusmeyer, A. C. Fitzgerald, A. C. Fabellar, J. M. Ballam, R. A. Cady, and J. L. Vicini Effect of recombinant bovine somatotropin and a shortened or no dry period on the performance of lactating dairy cows J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2009; 92(11): 5503 - 5511. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. D. Watters, M. C. Wiltbank, J. N. Guenther, A. E. Brickner, R. R. Rastani, P. M. Fricke, and R. R. Grummer Effect of dry period length on reproduction during the subsequent lactation J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2009; 92(7): 3081 - 3090. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. T. Church, L. K. Fox, C. T. Gaskins, D. D. Hancock, and J. M. Gay The Effect of a Shortened Dry Period on Intramammary Infections During the Subsequent Lactation J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2008; 91(11): 4219 - 4225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |