JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Dairy Sci. 2007. 90:5199-5207. doi:10.3168/jds.2007-0402
© 2007 American Dairy Science Association ®

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Interpretive Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Osborne, V. R.
Right arrow Articles by McBride, B. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Osborne, V. R.
Right arrow Articles by McBride, B. W.

Effects of Photoperiod and Glucose-Supplemented Drinking Water on the Performance of Dairy Calves

V. R. Osborne*,1, N. E. Odongo*, A. M. Edwards{dagger} and B. W. McBride*

* Department of Animal and Poultry Science, and
{dagger} Computing and Communications Services, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1

1 Corresponding author: vosborne{at}uoguelph.ca

Long-day photoperiods (LDPP) have been shown to increase milk production in lactating dairy cattle. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of supplemental light and glucose-supplemented drinking water on starter dry matter intake (DMI), water intake, serum and rumen metabolites, and growth performance of calves from birth to 8 wk of age. The experiment was conducted as a completely randomized design with a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement of treatments. The calves were assigned at birth to 1 of 4 treatments: 1) 10 h of light, 14 h of dark (short-day photoperiods; SDPP), ad libitum intake of water, and no glucose supplementation; 2) 10 h of light, 14 h of dark, and ad libitum intake of water supplemented with 50 g of glucose/L; 3) 18 h of light, 6 h of dark (LDPP), and ad libitum intake of water, and no glucose supplementation; and 4) 18 h of light, 6 h of dark, and ad libitum intake of water supplemented with 50 g of glucose/L. Fluorescent lights were used to provide lighting at an intensity of approximately 600 lx at the eye level of calves. The calves were bucket-fed 2 L of whole milk offered twice daily at 0700 and 1600 h and had a free access to a textured calf starter. The calves on LDPP were heavier at d 56 than SDPP calves regardless of level of glucose supplementation. The average daily gain of the calves on LDPP from d 29 to 42 and from d 43 to 56 was greater than for SDPP calves regardless of the level of glucose supplementation. The greater average daily gain of LDPP calves from d 29 to 56 coincided with the greater calf starter DMI of these calves. Body widths through hooks were highly (r = 0.72) correlated with body weights, which in turn were related to calf starter DMI. Calves on LDPP had greater ruminal osmolarity and greater concentrations of acetate, propionate, butyrate, and total volatile fatty acids than SDPP calves regardless of the level of glucose supplementation. Calves on LDPP had lower Ca:P ratio than the SDPP calves regardless of level of glucose supplementation. The concentrations of serum glucose and sodium for the glucose-supplemented calves were greater than for nonsupplemented calves regardless of lighting regimen. These results suggest that LDPP encouraged greater consumption of calf starter, which stimulated faster rumen development in the LDPP calves as evidenced by greater volatile fatty acid concentrations.

Key Words: photoperiod • drinking water • glucose supplementation • dairy calf







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.