HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Interpretive Summary Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cho, J. Articles by Tauer, L. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cho, J. Articles by Tauer, L. W.

Determining the Amount of Rumen-Protected Methionine Supplement That Corresponds to the Optimal Levels of Methionine in Metabolizable Protein for Maximizing Milk Protein Production and Profit on Dairy Farms

J. Cho^*, T. R. Overton, C. G. Schwab and L. W. Tauer^*,1

^* Department of Applied Economics and Management, and
Department of Animal Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
Department of Animal and Nutritional Sciences, University of New Hampshire, Durham 03824

¹ Corresponding author: lwt1{at}cornell.edu

The profitability of feeding rumen-protected Met (RPMet) sources to produce milk protein was estimated using a 2-step procedure: First, the effect of Met in metabolizable protein (MP) on milk protein production was estimated by using a quadratic Box-Cox functional form. Then, using these estimation results, the amounts of RPMet supplement that corresponded to the optimal levels of Met in MP for maximizing milk protein production and profit on dairy farms were determined. The data used in this study were modified from data used to determine the optimal level of Met in MP for lactating cows in the Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle (NRC, 2001). The data used in this study differ from that in the NRC (2001) data in 2 ways. First, because dairy feed generally contains 1.80 to 1.90% Met in MP, this study adjusts the reference production value (RPV) from 2.06 to 1.80 or 1.90%. Consequently, the milk protein production response is also modified to an RPV of 1.80 or 1.90% Met in MP. Second, because this study is especially interested in how much additional Met, beyond the 1.80 or 1.90% already contained in the basal diet, is required to maximize farm profits, the data used are limited to concentrations of Met in MP above 1.80 or 1.90%. This allowed us to calculate any additional cost to farmers based solely on the price of an RPMet supplement and eliminated the need to estimate the dollar value of each gram of Met already contained in the basal diet. Results indicated that the optimal level of Met in MP for maximizing milk protein production was 2.40 and 2.42%, where the RPV was 1.80 and 1.90%, respectively. These optimal levels were almost identical to the recommended level of Met in MP of 2.40% in the NRC (2001). The amounts of RPMet required to increase the percentage of Met in MP from each RPV to 2.40 and 2.42% were 21.6 and 18.5 g/d, respectively. On the other hand, the optimal levels of Met in MP for maximizing profit were 2.32 and 2.34%, respectively. The amounts of RPMet required to increase the percentage of Met in MP from each RPV to 2.32 and 2.34% were 18.7 and 15.6 g/d, respectively. In each case, the additional daily profit per cow was estimated to be $0.38 and $0.29. These additional profit estimates were $0.02 higher than the additional profit estimates for maximizing milk protein production.

Key Words: methionine • milk protein • profit

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Vyas and R. A. Erdman Meta-analysis of milk protein yield responses to lysine and methionine supplementation J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2009; 92(10): 5011 - 5018. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]