JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Interpretive Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walsh, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by LeBlanc, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Walsh, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by LeBlanc, S. J.
J. Dairy Sci. 90:315-324
© American Dairy Science Association, 2007.

Prevalence and Risk Factors for Postpartum Anovulatory Condition in Dairy Cows

R. B. Walsh*,1, D. F. Kelton*, T. F. Duffield*, K. E. Leslie*, J. S. Walton{dagger} and S. J. LeBlanc*

* Department of Population Medicine, and
{dagger} Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada, N1G 2W1

1 Corresponding author: rwalsh{at}uoguelph.ca

The objectives of this research were to determine the prevalence of the anovulatory condition within a temperate region of North America and identify cow-level and herd-level risk factors for this condition. A total of 1,341 cows from 18 herds were classified as cycling or anovular based on skim milk progesterone concentration determined at 46 and 60 ± 7 d in milk. Calving history, periparturient disease incidence, body condition score, milk ketone concentration in the first 2 wk of lactation, and first 305-d mature-equivalent milk projections were recorded. Reproductive and culling information was retrieved monthly from the Dairy Herd Improvement Association. The cow-level prevalence of anovulation was 19.5%, with a herd-specific range from 5 to 45%. Accounting for the effect of clustering at the herd level, cows experiencing a difficult calving, cows with twin calvings, displaced abomasum, and cows with subclinical ketosis in the first week after calving were at greater risk for diagnosis of anovulation. Anovular cows within herds using ovulation synchronization programs were inseminated at the same time postpartum with a 6-percentage point reduction in the probability of pregnancy relative to cycling herdmates (29.7 vs. 35.9%, respectively), whereas anovular cows in herds breeding based on observed estrus were inseminated 8 d later and suffered a 10-percentage point reduction in the probability of pregnancy at first insemination (20.3 vs. 30.5). Time to pregnancy was delayed in anovular cows by 30 d (156 vs. 126 d). Using survival analysis, the impact of anovulation decreased with time. The daily probability of pregnancy (hazard ratio) was similar to cycling cows by 165 d in milk. The results underline the important associations of peripartum health with reproductive function and performance.

Key Words: anovulation • time to pregnancy • ketosis • progesterone




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
P. Bossaert, J. L. M. R. Leroy, S. De Vliegher, and G. Opsomer
Interrelations Between Glucose-Induced Insulin Response, Metabolic Indicators, and Time of First Ovulation in High-Yielding Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2008; 91(9): 3363 - 3371.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.