JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Interpretive Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by König, S.
Right arrow Articles by Gauly, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by König, S.
Right arrow Articles by Gauly, M.
J. Dairy Sci. 89:3636-3644
© American Dairy Science Association, 2006.

Use of Repeated Measures Analysis for Evaluation of Genetic Background of Dairy Cattle Behavior in Automatic Milking Systems

S. König*,1, F. Köhn*, K. Kuwan{dagger}, H. Simianer* and M. Gauly*

* Institute of Animal Breeding and Genetics, University of Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany
{dagger} Vereinigte Informationssysteme Tierhaltung (VIT), Heideweg 1, 27283 Verden, Germany

1 Corresponding author: skoenig2{at}gwdg.de

Milking frequencies measured at official test days were used with repeated measurement analysis to reveal the environmental and genetic impact on the milking frequency of cows in automatic milking systems. Repeated measurements were 3 test-day observations per cow within days in milk (DIM) classes, with 1,216 cows in DIM class 1 (d 0 to 99), from 1,112 cows in DIM class 2 (d 100 to 199), and from 1,004 cows in DIM class 3 (d 200 to 299) kept in 15 farms. Selection criteria for models analyzing repeated measurements were Akaike and Schwarz Bayesian values, which favored the autoregressive [AR(1)] covariance structure over the compound symmetry model. Results from the AR(1) model indicated a significant impact of fixed herd and parity effects. Milking frequencies decreased with increasing parities and were greatest for first-parity cows. High daily milk yield was associated with higher milking frequencies. Heritabilities for milking frequency were 0.16, 0.19, and 0.22 in DIM classes 1, 2, and 3, respectively, from the AR(1) model. Higher heritabilities in the later stage of lactation were due to a substantial reduction of the residual variance. Genetic correlations between test-day milk yield and daily milking frequency were in the range of 0.46 to 0.57 for all DIM classes and between milking frequency and somatic cell score were near zero. For verification of results, milking frequencies of the same cows obtained from herd management programs were averaged within DIM classes. Heritabilities were slightly above the values from the AR(1) model. In conclusion, heritabilities for milking frequency in automatic milking systems are moderate enough to incorporate this behavioral trait in a combined breeding goal. The inevitable improvement of labor efficiency in dairy cattle farming demands such cows going easily and voluntarily in automatic milking systems.

Key Words: automatic milking system • milking frequency • heritability • genetic correlation







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.