HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Interpretive Summary Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gygax, L. Articles by Wechsler, B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gygax, L. Articles by Wechsler, B.

Milk Cortisol Concentration in Automatic Milking Systems Compared with Auto-Tandem Milking Parlors

L. Gygax^*,1, I. Neuffer^*, C. Kaufmann, R. Hauser^* and B. Wechsler^*

^* Centre for Proper Housing of Ruminants and Pigs, Swiss Federal Veterinary Office, Agroscope FAT Tänikon, Ettenhausen 8356, Switzerland
Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, Clinic for Ruminants, University of Berne, Berne 3001, Switzerland

¹ Corresponding author: lorenz.gygax{at}art.admin.ch

Milk cortisol concentration was determined under routine management conditions on 4 farms with an auto-tandem milking parlor and 8 farms with 1 of 2 automatic milking systems (AMS). One of the AMS was a partially forced (AMSp) system, and the other was a free cow traffic (AMSf) system. Milk samples were collected for all the cows on a given farm (20 to 54 cows) for at least 1 d. Behavioral observations were made during the milking process for a subset of 16 to 20 cows per farm. Milk cortisol concentration was evaluated by milking system, time of day, behavior during milking, daily milk yield, and somatic cell count using linear mixed-effects models. Milk cortisol did not differ between systems (AMSp: 1.15 ± 0.07; AMSf: 1.02 ± 0.12; auto-tandem parlor: 1.01 ± 0.16 nmol/L). Cortisol concentrations were lower in evening than in morning milkings (1.01 ± 0.12 vs. 1.24 ± 0.13 nmol/L). The daily periodicity of cortisol concentration was characterized by an early morning peak and a late afternoon elevation in AMSp. A bimodal pattern was not evident in AMSf. Finally, milk cortisol decreased by a factor of 0.915 in milking parlors, by 0.998 in AMSp, and increased by a factor of 1.161 in AMSf for each unit of ln(somatic cell count/1,000). We conclude that milking cows in milking parlors or AMS does not result in relevant stress differences as measured by milk cortisol concentrations. The biological relevance of the difference regarding the daily periodicity of milk cortisol concentrations observed between the AMSp and AMSf needs further investigation.

Key Words: dairy cow • milk cortisol • automatic milking system • auto-tandem parlor

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. M. Bruckmaier and O. Wellnitz Induction of milk ejection and milk removal in different production systems J Anim Sci, March 1, 2008; 86(13_suppl): 15 - 20. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. M. Svennersten-Sjaunja and G. Pettersson Pros and cons of automatic milking in Europe J Anim Sci, March 1, 2008; 86(13_suppl): 37 - 46. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]