HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Interpretive Summary Supplemental Data Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Raymond, M. J. Articles by Call, D. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Raymond, M. J. Articles by Call, D. R.

Assessment and Promotion of Judicious Antibiotic Use on Dairy Farms in Washington State

M. J. Raymond^*, R. D. Wohrle^* and D. R. Call^,1

^* Communicable Disease Control Program, Tacoma-Pierce County Health Department, Tacoma, WA 98418
Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Pathology, Washington State University, Pullman 99164

¹ Corresponding author: drcall{at}vetmed.wsu.edu

The aims of this study were to describe antibiotic use and biosecurity practices among Washington State dairy producers and to evaluate the effectiveness of a collaborative approach to promoting judicious antibiotic use on dairy farms. In collaboration with a statewide industry group, Washington State dairy producers participated in a written, self-administered survey in 2003. They were then provided several educational interventions followed by a second written survey in 2005. Sixty-five percent (381) of dairy producers completed the 2003 survey. The most commonly cited drugs used for disease treatment were penicillin, ceftiofur, and oxytetracycline. Participants also indicated significant preventive uses with 28% using medicated milk replacer. Most producers appeared to consider intramammary infusion at dry-off to be a treatment rather than a preventative practice. Twenty-three percent of initial respondents indicated at least one extra-label use of antibiotics, yet only half routinely consulted with a veterinarian when doing so. Most agreed that using written protocols for disease treatment could reduce errors, but less than one-third had protocols. After the educational intervention there was a tendency toward reduced use of antibiotic medicated milk replacer: 51% of producers who originally reported using medicated milk replacer discontinued this practice, whereas 12% of producers began using medicated milk replacer between the 2003 and 2005 surveys. Most reported that the resources and educational materials were useful. Areas where additional work is needed include reducing the use of medicated milk replacer, increasing veterinary involvement in antibiotic use decisions, implementing treatment protocols, enhancing biosecurity, and ensuring optimal cow and calf immunity.

Key Words: antibiotic use • biosecurity • milk replacer

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Schmitt-Van de Leemput and R. N. Zadoks Genotypic and Phenotypic Detection of Macrolide and Lincosamide Resistance in Streptococcus uberis J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2007; 90(11): 5089 - 5096. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. T. Walk, J. M. Mladonicky, J. A. Middleton, A. J. Heidt, J. R. Cunningham, P. Bartlett, K. Sato, and T. S. Whittam Influence of Antibiotic Selection on Genetic Composition of Escherichia coli Populations from Conventional and Organic Dairy Farms Appl. Envir. Microbiol., October 1, 2007; 73(19): 5982 - 5989. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]