|
|
||||||||


* Northeast Dairy Foods Research Center Department of Food Science, Cornell University Ithaca, NY 14853
Kestrel Software Consulting, Berkshire, NY 13736
USDA, Agricultural Marketing Service, Texas Milk Marketing Area, P. O. Box 110939 Carrollton 75011
2 Corresponding author: dmb37{at}cornell.edu
Mid-infrared (MIR) milk analyzers are traditionally calibrated using sets of preserved raw individual producer milk samples. The goal of this study was to determine if the use of sets of preserved pasteurized modified milks improved calibration performance of MIR milk analyzers compared with calibration sets of producer milks. The preserved pasteurized modified milk sets exhibited more consistent day-to-day and set-to-set calibration slope and intercept values for all components compared with the preserved raw producer milk calibration sets. Pasteurized modified milk calibration samples achieved smaller confidence interval (CI) around the regression line (i.e., calibration uncertainty). Use of modified milk calibration sets with a larger component range, more even distribution of component concentrations within the ranges, and the lower correlation of fat and protein concentrations than producer milk calibration sets produced a smaller 95% CI for the regression line due to the elimination of moderate and high leverage samples. The CI for the producer calibration sets were about 2 to 12 times greater than the CI for the modified milk calibration sets, depending on the component. Modified milk calibration samples have the potential to produce MIR milk analyzer calibrations that will perform better in validation checks than producer milk-based calibrations by reducing the mean difference and standard deviation of the difference between instrument values and reference chemistry.
Key Words: infrared milk analyzer calibration modified milk
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Evans, J. Zulewska, M. Newbold, M. A. Drake, and D. M. Barbano Comparison of composition, sensory, and volatile components of thirty-four percent whey protein and milk serum protein concentrates J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2009; 92(10): 4773 - 4791. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. E. Kaylegian, J. M. Lynch, J. R. Fleming, and D. M. Barbano Influence of fatty acid chain length and unsaturation on mid-infrared milk analysis J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2009; 92(6): 2485 - 2501. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. E. Kaylegian, D. A. Dwyer, J. M. Lynch, D. E. Bauman, J. R. Fleming, and D. M. Barbano Impact of fatty acid composition on the accuracy of mid-infrared fat analysis of farm milks J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2009; 92(6): 2502 - 2513. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Zulewska, M. Newbold, and D. M. Barbano Efficiency of serum protein removal from skim milk with ceramic and polymeric membranes at 50{degrees}C J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2009; 92(4): 1361 - 1377. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. E. Kaylegian, J. M. Lynch, J. R. Fleming, and D. M. Barbano Lipolysis and Proteolysis of Modified and Producer Milks Used for Calibration of Mid-Infrared Milk Analyzers J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2007; 90(2): 602 - 615. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. E. Kaylegian, J. M. Lynch, G. E. Houghton, J. R. Fleming, and D. M. Barbano Modified versus producer milk calibration: mid-infrared analyzer performance validation. J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2006; 89(8): 2833 - 2845. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |