JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Interpretive Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kononoff, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Klopfenstein, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kononoff, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Klopfenstein, T. J.
J. Dairy Sci. 89:2608-2617
© American Dairy Science Association, 2006.

Milk Production of Dairy Cows Fed Wet Corn Gluten Feed During the Dry Period and Lactation1

P. J. Kononoff*,2, S. K. Ivan*,3, W. Matzke*,4, R. J. Grant{dagger}, R. A. Stock{ddagger} and T. J. Klopfenstein*

* Department of Animal Science, University of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583-0908
{dagger} Miner Institute, Chazy, NY 12921
{ddagger} Cargill Incorporated, Blair, NE 68008

2 Corresponding author: pkononoff2{at}unl.edu

An experiment was conducted with 36 primiparous and 40 multiparous Holstein cows to examine the effects of feeding wet corn gluten feed (WCGF) on 305-d milk production, dry matter (DM) intake, body condition score (BCS), and health. The experimental treatments included: 1) control—WCGF not fed (n = 27); 2) WCGF-L—cows received diets containing WCGF (38% DM basis) during lactation (n = 23); and 3) WCGF-DL—cows received diets containing WCGF (38% DM basis) during the dry period and lactation (n = 26). During the dry period, cows consuming WCGF were observed to have a significant gain in BCS (0.07 ± 0.06) compared with a loss in BCS in cows fed the control diet (control = –0.11 ± 0.06 and WCGF-L = –0.04 ± 0.06). During lactation, there were no differences by treatment on BCS. Cows consuming WCGF during lactation consumed more feed compared with the control: 25.4, 23.8, and 21.2 ± 0.76 kg/d for WCGF-L, WCGF-DL, and the control, respectively. Milk production was higher for cows consuming WCGF: 35.0, 34.7, and 31.1 ± 2.1 kg/d for WCGF-L, WCGF-DL, and the control, respectively. No differences were found in either DM intake or actual milk yield between the WCGF-L and WCGF-DL treatments, indicating that prepartum diets did not influence lactational performance. The WCGF diets resulted in significant reductions in the concentration of milk fat (3.94, 3.74, and 4.15 ± 0.08% for WCGF-L, WCGF-DL, and the control, respectively), but because total milk yield was increased, there were no differences in total milk fat yield. In addition, 3.5% of fat-corrected milk tended to be affected by diet: 38.9, 36.3, and 34.7 ± 1.93 kg/d for WCGF-L, WCGF-DL, and the control, respectively. The increasing effect of DM intake and milk yield in cows consuming WCGF resulted in a similar efficiency of 3.5% fat-corrected milk production for all treatments, averaging 1.5 ± 0.09. Total protein yields were significantly higher for cows consuming WCGF diets during lactation: 1.15, 1.10, 1.00 ± 0.06 kg/d for WCGF-L, WCGF-DL, and the control, respectively. These results indicate that diets may be formulated to contain as much as 37.5% WCGF (DM basis).

Key Words: lactation • corn gluten feed • dairy




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
C. R. Mullins, K. N. Grigsby, and B. J. Bradford
Effects of alfalfa hay inclusion rate on productivity of lactating dairy cattle fed wet corn gluten feed-based diets,
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2009; 92(7): 3510 - 3516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Professional Animal ScientistHome page
D. W. Shike, D. B. Faulkner, D. F. Parrett, and W. J. Sexten
Influences of Corn Co-products in Limit-Fed Rations on Cow Performance, Lactation, Nutrient Output, and Subsequent Reproduction
Professional Animal Scientist, April 1, 2009; 25(2): 132 - 138.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
B. N. Janicek, P. J. Kononoff, A. M. Gehman, K. Karges, and M. L. Gibson
Short Communication: Effect of Increasing Levels of Corn Bran on Milk Yield and Composition
J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2007; 90(9): 4313 - 4316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
P. J. Kononoff, S. K. Ivan, and T. J. Klopfenstein
Estimation of the Proportion of Feed Protein Digested in the Small Intestine of Cattle Consuming Wet Corn Gluten Feed
J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2007; 90(5): 2377 - 2385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.