HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Interpretive Summary Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hadley, G. L. Articles by Harsh, S. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hadley, G. L. Articles by Harsh, S. B.

Dairy Cattle Culling Patterns, Explanations, and Implications

G. L. Hadley^*, C. A. Wolf and S. B. Harsh

^* Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Wisconsin-River Falls, River Falls 54022
Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824

¹ Corresponding author: wolfch{at}msu.edu

Culling patterns in the Upper Midwest and Northeast regions were examined from Dairy Herd Improvement records from 1993 through 1999. There were 7,087,699 individual cow lactation observations of which 1,458,936 were complete. A probit regression model was used to determine how individual cow and herd characteristics affected the likelihood of a cow being culled. The model predicted whether individual cows were culled each month. With a combination of observable cow and herd characteristics, as well as variables to capture state, year, and farm effects, the model was able to explain, with a 79.5 and 79.9% accuracy rate, individual cow cull decisions in the Upper Midwest and Northeast regions, respectively. Summer (– 11.5% in the Upper Midwest; – 6.4% in the Northeast) and fall (– 18.7% in the Upper Midwest; – 7.9% in the Northeast) calving vs. spring calving, higher than average milk production (– 1.7% per hundredweight in the Upper Midwest; – 0.5% in the Northeast), higher than average protein content (– 0.2% per additional percentage milk protein in the Upper Midwest; – 0.1% in the Northeast), higher milk production persistency (– 2.1% per additional percent persistent in the Upper Midwest; – 1.8% in the Northeast), and expansion (during the early years following the expansion) were associated with a reduced likelihood of a cow being culled. Lower than average fat content (0.04% per additional percentage butterfat in the Upper Midwest; 0.02% in the Northeast), and higher than average somatic cell count (8.8% for each unit increase in somatic cell count score in the Upper Midwest; 7.8% in the Northeast) were associated with an increased likelihood of a cow being culled. The study results are useful in describing patterns of culling and relating them to cow, herd, geographic, and time variables and can act as a benchmark for producers.

Key Words: culling • economics • management

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Bar, Y. T. Grohn, G. Bennett, R. N. Gonzalez, J. A. Hertl, H. F. Schulte, L. W. Tauer, F. L. Welcome, and Y. H. Schukken Effects of Repeated Episodes of Generic Clinical Mastitis on Mortality and Culling in Dairy Cows J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2008; 91(6): 2196 - 2204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				U. S. Sorge, D. F. Kelton, K. D. Lissemore, W. Sears, and J. Fetrow Evaluation of the Dairy Comp 305 Module "Cow Value" in Two Ontario Dairy Herds J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2007; 90(12): 5784 - 5797. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]