JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Interpretive Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ray, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by May, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ray, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by May, K.
J. Dairy Sci. 89:2038-2050
© American Dairy Science Association, 2006.

Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Salmonella from Organic and Conventional Dairy Farms

K. A. Ray*, L. D. Warnick*,1, R. M. Mitchell*, J. B. Kaneene{dagger}, P. L. Ruegg{ddagger}, S. J. Wells§, C. P. Fossler§, L. W. Halbert{dagger} and K. May{dagger}

* Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
{dagger} Population Medicine Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824
{ddagger} Department of Dairy Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706
§ Department of Veterinary Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108

1 Corresponding author: ldw3{at}cornell.edu

The objective of this study was to compare antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella isolated from conventional and organic dairy farms in the Midwest and Northeast United States. Environmental and fecal samples were collected from organic (n = 26) and conventional (n = 69) farms in Michigan, Minnesota, New York, and Wisconsin every 2 mo from August 2000 to October 2001. Salmonella isolates (n = 1,243) were tested using a broth microdilution method for susceptibility to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, ampicillin, ceftiofur, ceftriaxone, cephalothin, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, kanamycin, nalidixic acid, streptomycin, sulfamethoxazole, tetracycline, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Herd-level logistic regression and logistic proportional hazards multivariable models were used to examine the association between farm management type and susceptibility to antimicrobial agents. For most antimicrobial agents tested, susceptibility of Salmonella isolates was similar on organic and conventional herds when controlling for herd size and state. Conventional farms were more likely to have at least one Salmonella isolate resistant to streptomycin using logistic regression (odds ratio = 7.5; 95% confidence interval = 1.7–5.4). Conventional farms were more likely to have Salmonella isolates with greater resistance to streptomycin (odds ratio = 5.4; 95% confidence interval = 1.5–19.0) and sulfamethoxazole (odds ratio = 4.2; 95% confidence interval = 1.2–14.1) using logistic proportional hazards models. Although not statistically significant, conventional farms tended to be more likely to have at least one Salmonella isolate resistant to 5 or more antimicrobial agents when compared with organic farms.

Key Words: antibiotic • antimicrobial • Salmonella • organic




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
J. B. Kaneene, L. D. Warnick, C. A. Bolin, R. J. Erskine, K. May, and R. Miller
Changes in Tetracycline Susceptibility of Enteric Bacteria following Switching to Nonmedicated Milk Replacer for Dairy Calves
J. Clin. Microbiol., June 1, 2008; 46(6): 1968 - 1977.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
J. M. Siegford, W. Powers, and H. G. Grimes-Casey
Environmental Aspects of Ethical Animal Production
Poult. Sci., February 1, 2008; 87(2): 380 - 386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.