JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Interpretive Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Silvestre, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Colaço, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Silvestre, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Colaço, J.
J. Dairy Sci. 89:1813-1821
© American Dairy Science Association, 2006.

The Accuracy of Seven Mathematical Functions in Modeling Dairy Cattle Lactation Curves Based on Test-Day Records From Varying Sample Schemes

A. M. Silvestre1, F. Petim-Batista and J. Colaço

Departement of Animal Science–CECAV, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, 5001-801 Vila Real, Portugal

1 Corresponding author: asilvest{at}utad.pt

Daily milk yield over the course of the lactation follows a curvilinear pattern, so a suitable function is required to model this curve. In this study, 7 functions (Wood, Wilmink, Ali and Schaeffer, cubic splines, and 3 Legendre polynomials) were used to model the lactation curve at the phenotypic level, using both daily observations and data from commonly used recording schemes. The number of observations per lactation varied from 4 to 11. Several criteria based on the analysis of the real error were used to compare models. The performance of models showed few discrepancies in the comparison criteria when daily or 4-weekly (with first test at days in milk 8) data by lactation were used. The performance of the Wood, Wilmink, and Ali and Schaeffer models were highly affected by the reduction of the sample dimension. The results of this work support the idea that the performance of these models depends on the sample properties but also shows considerable variation within the sampling groups.

Key Words: dairy cow • lactation curve




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
E. Kramer, E. Stamer, J. Spilke, G. Thaller, and J. Krieter
Analysis of water intake and dry matter intake using different lactation curve models
J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2009; 92(8): 4072 - 4081.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
A. S. Santos and A. M. Silvestre
A Study of Lusitano Mare Lactation Curve with Wood's Model
J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2008; 91(2): 760 - 766.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
C. M. B. Dematawewa, R. E. Pearson, and P. M. VanRaden
Modeling Extended Lactations of Holsteins
J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2007; 90(8): 3924 - 3936.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.