JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Collier, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by VanBaale, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Collier, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by VanBaale, M. J.
J. Dairy Sci. 89:1244-1253
© American Dairy Science Association, 2006.

Major Advances Associated with Environmental Effects on Dairy Cattle

R. J. Collier*,1, G. E. Dahl{dagger} and M. J. VanBaale*

* Department of Animal Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson 85721
{dagger} Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801

1 Corresponding author: rcollier{at}ag.arizona.edu

It has long been known that season of the year has major impacts on dairy animal performance measures including growth, reproduction, and lactation. Additionally, as average production per cow has doubled, the metabolic heat output per animal has increased substantially rendering animals more susceptible to heat stress. This, in turn, has altered cooling and housing requirements for cattle. Substantial progress has been made in the last quarter-century in delineating the mechanisms by which thermal stress and photoperiod influence performance of dairy animals. Acclimation to thermal stress is now identified as a homeorhetic process under endocrine control. The process of acclimation occurs in 2 phases (acute and chronic) and involves changes in secretion rate of hormones as well as receptor populations in target tissues. The time required to complete both phases is weeks rather than days. The opportunity may exist to modify endocrine status of animals and improve their resistance to heat and cold stress. New estimates of genotype x environment interactions support use of recently available molecular and genomics tools to identify the genetic basis of heat-stress sensitivity and tolerance. Improved understanding of environmental effects on nutrient requirements has resulted in diets for dairy animals during different weather conditions. Demonstration that estrus behavior is adversely affected by heat stress has led to increased use of timed insemination schemes during the warm summer months to improve conception rates by discarding the need to detect estrus. Studies evaluating the effects of heat stress on embryonic survival support use of cooling during the immediate postbreeding period and use of embryo transfer to improve pregnancy rates. Successful cooling strategies for lactating dairy cows are based on maximizing available routes of heat exchange, convection, conduction, radiation, and evaporation. Areas in dairy operations in which cooling systems have been used to enhance cow comfort, improve milk production, reproductive efficiency, and profit include both housing and milking facilities. Currently, air movement (fans), wetting (soaking) the cow’s body surface, high pressure mist (evaporation) to cool the air in the cows’ environment, and facilities designed to minimize the transfer of solar radiation are used for heat abatement. Finally, improved understanding of photoperiod effects on cattle has allowed producers to maximize beneficial effects of photoperiod length while minimizing negative effects.

Key Words: environment • heat stress • photoperiod • adaptation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
B. C. do Amaral, E. E. Connor, S. Tao, J. Hayen, J. Bubolz, and G. E. Dahl
Heat-stress abatement during the dry period: Does cooling improve transition into lactation?
J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2009; 92(12): 5988 - 5999.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
B. J. Nonnecke, M. R. Foote, B. L. Miller, M. Fowler, T. E. Johnson, and R. L. Horst
Effects of chronic environmental cold on growth, health, and select metabolic and immunologic responses of preruminant calves
J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2009; 92(12): 6134 - 6143.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
N. M. Marcillac-Embertson, P. H. Robinson, J. G. Fadel, and F. M. Mitloehner
Effects of shade and sprinklers on performance, behavior, physiology, and the environment of heifers
J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2009; 92(2): 506 - 517.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
G. E. Dahl
Effects of short day photoperiod on prolactin signaling in dry cows: A common mechanism among tissues and environments?
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2008; 86(13_suppl): 10 - 14.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
N. B. Cook, R. L. Mentink, T. B. Bennett, and K. Burgi
The Effect of Heat Stress and Lameness on Time Budgets of Lactating Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2007; 90(4): 1674 - 1682.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.