JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Interpretive Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saint-Eve, A.
Right arrow Articles by Souchon, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saint-Eve, A.
Right arrow Articles by Souchon, I.
J. Dairy Sci. 89:922-933
© American Dairy Science Association, 2006.

Influence of Proteins on the Perception of Flavored Stirred Yogurts

A. Saint-Eve, C. Lévy, N. Martin and I. Souchon1

Unité Mixte de Recherche de Génie et Microbiologie des Procédés Alimentaires, INA PG–INRA, 78850 Thiverval-Grignon, France

1 Corresponding author: souchon{at}grignon.inra.fr

Among yogurt dairy components, protein type is known to modify the texture of the products and the volatility of odorous volatile organic compounds. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of 3 protein ratios (caseinate to total protein) on the sensory properties of 4% fat, strawberry-flavored stirred yogurts. A sensory methodology study was therefore investigated to choose the most efficient method in terms of sensitivity, quantification, and ease with which the panel could distinguish slight differences in olfactory property between the yogurts. Three kinds of product presentation procedures were compared: a monadic presentation, a comparative presentation, and a comparative presentation with a reference. The results showed that the 3 presentation methods emphasized some important texture differences between the yogurts in the same way. However, the comparative procedure with a reference was the only one to reveal clear olfactory property differences between the yogurts. The main effect of protein ratio variation in yogurt concerned the texture properties, which greatly differed between the 3 yogurts and was confirmed by complex viscosity measurements. Olfactory differences between the yogurts were more subtle. Overall, the flavor intensity and the fruity notes were less intense in the yogurts with the high caseinate ratio than in those with the low ratio. This result was in agreement with the physicochemical measurements, which showed a higher retention of a large majority of aroma compounds of the strawberry flavor in the yogurts with a high caseinate ratio.

Key Words: texture and olfactory properties • milk protein • yogurt • sensory descriptive analysis




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
I. C. Trelea, S. Atlan, I. Deleris, A. Saint-Eve, M. Marin, and I. Souchon
Mechanistic Mathematical Model for In Vivo Aroma Release during Eating of Semiliquid Foods
Chem Senses, February 1, 2008; 33(2): 181 - 192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.