JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Interpretive Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Apper-Bossard, E.
Right arrow Articles by Meschy, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Apper-Bossard, E.
Right arrow Articles by Meschy, F.
J. Dairy Sci. 89:749-760
© American Dairy Science Association, 2006.

Changing Dietary Cation-Anion Difference for Dairy Cows Fed with Two Contrasting Levels of Concentrate in Diets

E. Apper-Bossard*, J. L. Peyraud*,1, P. Faverdin* and F. Meschy*,{dagger}

* Unité Mixte de Recherches INRA-Agrocampus Production du Lait, Domaine de la Prise, 35590 Saint-Gilles, France
{dagger} Unité Mixte de Recherches, INRA-INAPG Physiologie de la Nutrition et Alimentation, INRA-INAPG, 16 rue Claude Bernard, F-75231 Paris Cedex 05, France

1 Corresponding author: jean-louis.peyraud{at}rennes.inra.fr

High-producing dairy cows are commonly fed diets containing a high proportion of rapidly degradable starch, which can cause subacute acidosis and reduce dry matter (DM) intake. Because of the properties of nonmetabolizable cations and anions, increasing the dietary cation-anion difference (DCAD = Na + K – Cl – S in mEq/kg of DM) may prevent a drop in DM intake. To test this hypothesis, 48 Holstein cows were blocked into 2 groups of 24 and assigned to two 3 x 3 Latin squares in a split-plot design. Each group received one level of concentrate at either 20% or 40% on a dry matter (DM) basis. The diet containing 20% concentrate was formulated to supply 4% rapidly degradable starch, whereas the diet containing 40% concentrate supplied 22% rapidly degradable starch. Diets in each square were formulated to provide a DCAD of 0, 150, or 300 mEq/kg of DM. The 3 values were obtained by manipulating Na and Cl contents. Intake, 4% fat-corrected milk yield, and milk fat percentage, as well as blood nonesterified fatty acids and ß-hydroxybutyrate increased with DCAD, but only on the diet providing 40% concentrate. The yield of trans-10 C18:1 and odd-chain fatty acids decreased with increasing DCAD, whereas trans-11 C18:1 increased. Again, this occurred only with the diet providing 40% concentrate. Blood pH and HCO3 concentration increased along with DCAD, irrespective of the concentrate level. A positive DCAD led to increasing DM intake and fat-corrected milk yield in dairy cows fed highly degradable diets. The mechanism involved may be a localized rumen buffering effect, together with the ability of positive DCAD to maintain blood acid-base status in cows faced with a massive acid input.

Key Words: dietary cation-anion difference • performance • acid-base status • dairy cow




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
C. Hurtaud and J. L. Peyraud
Effects of Feeding Camelina (Seeds or Meal) on Milk Fatty Acid Composition and Butter Spreadability
J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2007; 90(11): 5134 - 5145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
C. D. Wildman, J. W. West, and J. K. Bernard
Effect of Dietary Cation-Anion Difference and Dietary Crude Protein on Milk Yield, Acid-Base Chemistry, and Rumen Fermentation
J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2007; 90(10): 4693 - 4700.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
S. Couvreur, C. Hurtaud, C. Lopez, L. Delaby, and J. L. Peyraud
The linear relationship between the proportion of fresh grass in the cow diet, milk fatty acid composition, and butter properties.
J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2006; 89(6): 1956 - 1969.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.