JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Interpretive Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zebeli, Q.
Right arrow Articles by Drochner, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zebeli, Q.
Right arrow Articles by Drochner, W.
J. Dairy Sci. 89:651-668
© American Dairy Science Association, 2006.

Effects of Physically Effective Fiber on Digestive Processes and Milk Fat Content in Early Lactating Dairy Cows Fed Total Mixed Rations

Q. Zebeli1, M. Tafaj, H. Steingass, B. Metzler and W. Drochner

University of Hohenheim, Institute of Animal Nutrition (450), Emil-Wolff-Str. 10, D-70599 Stuttgart, Germany

1 Corresponding author: zebeli{at}uni-hohenheim.de

Data from recent research studies were analyzed quantitatively, and the random effect of experiment was assessed to define the physiological responses of dairy cows in early lactation to intake of physically effective neutral detergent fiber (peNDF). All studies were conducted with lactating Holstein cows (84.8 ± 3.54 days in milk) in Latin square designs, and feeds were offered ad libitum as total mixed rations (TMR). The peNDF was estimated by 2 measurement techniques, the NDF content of TMR multiplied by amount of dry matter (DM) retained on a 1.18-mm screen (peNDF> 1.18) and NDF content of TMR multiplied by the proportion of DM retained by 19- and 8-mm Penn State Particle Separator screens (peNDF> 8). Other factors, including concentrations of NDF, forage NDF, non-fiber carbohydrates, the amount of digestible organic matter of forages (FDOM), and the intake of ruminally degradable starch (RDSI) from grain in the diet were also investigated. The studied animal response variables included feed intake, ruminal fermentation, chewing activity, fiber digestibility, and milk production and composition. The ruminal pH (day mean) in this study ranged from 5.30 to 6.59. Using peNDF> 1.18 approach, the requirements for physically effective fiber in high-yielding dairy cows fed TMR in an ad libitum intake were estimated to be about 19% of ration DM or 4.1 kg/d or 0.6 kg/100 kg of body weight to maintain a ruminal pH of about 6.0. When peNDF was measured as peNDF> 8, ruminal pH responded in a quadratic fashion but the confidence of estimation was lower (R2 = 0.27) compared with the peNDF> 1.18 approach (R2 = 0.67). Results of these data analyses showed that peNDF> 1.18 provided a satisfactory estimation of the mean ruminal pH (R2 = 0.67) and NDF digestibility (R2 = 0.56). Furthermore, peNDF> 1.18 was poorly, although positively, correlated to daily chewing (R2 = 0.17), and rumination (R2 = 0.24) activity. On the other hand, results from these analyses showed that milk parameters are less sensitive to the effects of dietary peNDF than other variables, such as ruminal pH, chewing activity, and fiber digestibility. Dietary FDOM correlated positively (moderately) to ruminal pH (R2 = 0.24), daily chewing (R2 = 0.23), and rumination (R2 = 0.29) activity, whereas the daily RDSI from grain correlated negatively to ruminal pH (R2 = 0.55) and positively to total volatile fatty acids (R2 = 0.27). Inclusion of FDOM and RDSI from grain along with peNDF> 1.18 in the models that predict rumen pH further improved the accuracy of prediction. This approach appeared to further complement the concept of peNDF that does not account for differences in ruminal fermentability of feeds.

Key Words: physically effective fiber • dairy cow • rumen pH • chewing activity




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
W. Z. Yang and K. A. Beauchemin
Increasing physically effective fiber content of dairy cow diets through forage proportion versus forage chop length: Chewing and ruminal pH
J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2009; 92(4): 1603 - 1615.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
Q. Zebeli, J. Dijkstra, M. Tafaj, H. Steingass, B. N. Ametaj, and W. Drochner
Modeling the Adequacy of Dietary Fiber in Dairy Cows Based on the Responses of Ruminal pH and Milk Fat Production to Composition of the Diet
J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2008; 91(5): 2046 - 2066.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
W. Z. Yang and K. A. Beauchemin
Altering Physically Effective Fiber Intake Through Forage Proportion and Particle Length: Chewing and Ruminal pH
J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2007; 90(6): 2826 - 2838.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
Q. Zebeli, M. Tafaj, I. Weber, J. Dijkstra, H. Steingass, and W. Drochner
Effects of Varying Dietary Forage Particle Size in Two Concentrate Levels on Chewing Activity, Ruminal Mat Characteristics, and Passage in Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2007; 90(4): 1929 - 1942.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
G. B. Penner, K. A. Beauchemin, and T. Mutsvangwa
Severity of Ruminal Acidosis in Primiparous Holstein Cows During the Periparturient Period
J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2007; 90(1): 365 - 375.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
B. Rustomo, O. AlZahal, N. E. Odongo, T. F. Duffield, and B. W. McBride
Effects of Rumen Acid Load from Feed and Forage Particle Size on Ruminal pH and Dry Matter Intake in the Lactating Dairy Cow
J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2006; 89(12): 4758 - 4768.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
W. Z. Yang and K. A. Beauchemin
Physically effective fiber: method of determination and effects on chewing, ruminal acidosis, and digestion by dairy cows.
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2006; 89(7): 2618 - 2633.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.