JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Interpretive Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jensen, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Budde, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jensen, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Budde, M.
J. Dairy Sci. 89:4778-4783
© American Dairy Science Association, 2006.

The Effects of Milk Feeding Method and Group Size on Feeding Behavior and Cross-Sucking in Group-Housed Dairy Calves

M. B. Jensen1 and M. Budde

Department of Animal Health, Welfare and Nutrition, Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Research Centre Foulum, 8830 Tjele, Denmark

1 Corresponding author: MargitBak.Jensen{at}agrsci.dk

This study investigated the effect of teat feeding and group size on cross-sucking and competition for milk in dairy calves. Ninety-six Holstein-Friesian male and female calves were allocated to either pairs or groups of 6 and fed milk either from a bucket or via a teat. Calves fed via a teat spent more time ingesting the milk. They spent time sucking the empty teat after milk intake and they spent less time cross-sucking compared with calves fed from buckets. The results show that teat feeding reduces cross-sucking in groups of 6 calves. Calves in groups of 6 ingested the milk faster than calves housed in pairs, which suggests that the competition for milk was greater than in pairs. Teat-fed calves changed to another teat more often than bucket-fed calves changed to another bucket during milk intake. Thus, the use of teat feeding did not reduce the competition for milk as compared with bucket feeding and future studies should focus on improving teat-feeding methods so that they reduce competition for milk in group-housed calves.

Key Words: calf • cross-sucking • group size • milk feeding method




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
P. P. Nielsen, M. B. Jensen, and L. Lidfors
The Effects of Teat Bar Design and Weaning Method on Behavior, Intake, and Gain of Dairy Calves
J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2008; 91(6): 2423 - 2432.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. B. Jensen, A. M. de Passille, M. A. G. von Keyserlingk, and J. Rushen
A Barrier Can Reduce Competition over Teats in Pair-Housed Milk-Fed Calves
J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2008; 91(4): 1607 - 1613.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.