| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Consiglio per la Ricerca e la Sperimentazione in Agricoltura, Istituto Sperimentale per la Zootecnia, Sezione Operativa di Cremona, I-26100 Cremona, Italy
1 Corresponding author: marisanna.speroni{at}isz.it
A comparative study was performed to evaluate differences in milk yield between an automatic milking system (AMS) and a conventional herringbone milking parlor system. Two herds of Italian-Friesian cows were reared in the same barn, located in the Po Valley in northern Italy. Twenty-five primiparous cows and 10 multiparous cows were milked with an AMS, while at the same time 29 primiparous and 9 multiparous were milked twice daily in a milking parlor on the other side of the barn. A selection gate allowed cows to access the AMS only if the interval from last milking was >5 h. Multiparous cows in the AMS yielded more milk than multiparous cows in the milking parlor (34.2 ± 0.7 vs. 29.4 ± 0.6 kg/d). There was no difference in milk yield between primiparous cows in the AMS and in the milking parlor (28.9 ± 0.4 vs. 28.8 ± 0.3 kg/d). Milking frequency in the AMS was significantly higher in primiparous (2.8 ± 0.03) than in multiparous cows (2.5 ± 0.04). The hot season negatively affected milk yield; the milk yield reduction was higher for cows milked with the AMS (–4.5 ± 0.6 kg/d) than in the milking parlor (–3.0 ± 0.8 kg/d). In the AMS, milking frequency decreased during the hot season in primiparous cows (–0.3 ± 0.1). We concluded that a positive AMS effect on milk yield is possible, but that steps must be taken to alleviate the discomfort involved with attracting cows to the AMS.
Key Words: automatic milking • dairy cow • milk yield • milking frequency
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. Hovinen, M. D. Rasmussen, and S. Pyorala Udder health of cows changing from tie stalls or free stalls with conventional milking to free stalls with either conventional or automatic milking J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2009; 92(8): 3696 - 3703. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Abeni, M. G. Terzano, M. Speroni, L. Migliorati, M. Capelletti, F. Calza, L. Bianchi, and G. Pirlo Evaluation of Milk Enzymes and Electrolytes, Plasma Metabolites, and Oxidative Status in Twin Cows Milked in an Automatic Milking System or Twice Daily in a Conventional Milking Parlor J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2008; 91(9): 3372 - 3384. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. M. Svennersten-Sjaunja and G. Pettersson Pros and cons of automatic milking in Europe J Anim Sci, March 1, 2008; 86(13_suppl): 37 - 46. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Bach, C. Iglesias, S. Calsamiglia, and M. Devant Effect of Amount of Concentrate Offered in Automatic Milking Systems on Milking Frequency, Feeding Behavior, and Milk Production of Dairy Cattle Consuming High Amounts of Corn Silage J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2007; 90(11): 5049 - 5055. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
