JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Interpretive Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by De Palo, P.
Right arrow Articles by Centoducati, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by De Palo, P.
Right arrow Articles by Centoducati, P.
J. Dairy Sci. 89:4583-4595
© American Dairy Science Association, 2006.

Influence of Free-Stall Flooring on Comfort and Hygiene of Dairy Cows During Warm Climatic Conditions

P. De Palo1, A. Tateo, F. Zezza, M. Corrente and P. Centoducati

Department of Health and Welfare of Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Università degli Studi di Bari, Bari, Italy

1 Corresponding author: p.depalo{at}veterinaria.uniba.it

An evaluation of behavioral and hygienic conditions was carried out with 4 materials used as free-stall flooring for dairy cows: polyethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) and polypropylene vinyl acetate (PVA) mats, wood shavings, and solid manure. The free-stall type selected by cows was evaluated in response to changes in environmental temperature and humidity. Two tests were used: 1) a preference test, in which 8 cows were housed in a pen with 32 free stalls and 4 types of flooring; and 2) an aversion test, in which 32 cows were placed in 4 pens, each with 8 free stalls. The free stalls in each pen had a single type of bedding material. These tests showed that the comfort of dairy cows was predominantly influenced by environmental conditions. The preference test for lying showed that cows preferred free-stall floors with EVA mats over those with PVA mats, wood shavings, and solid manure (332.4 ± 24.0 vs. 130.8 ± 6.2, 160.9 ± 23.7, and 102.6 ± 23.2 min/d, respectively), but under conditions of heat stress, with a temperature–humidity index > 80, they chose wood shavings and solid manure lying areas. These results were confirmed by the aversion test. In all experimental and environmental conditions, the PVA mats were the least suitable. The mats contaminated with organic manure and the free stalls bedded with wood shavings and organic solids did not differ in either the coliform load on the lying surfaces (EVA mats: 290 ± 25; PVA mats: 306 ± 33; wood shavings: 290 ± 39; and solid manure: 305 ± 23 log10 cfu/mL) or the total bacterial count in the raw milk (EVA mats: 232 ± 22; PVA mats: 233 + 24; wood shavings: 221 ± 24; and solid manure: 220 ± 25 log10 cfu/mL). These results demonstrate that the comfort of dairy cows housed in barns with free stalls as resting areas does not depend only on the material used, but also on the value of the material in microenvironmental conditions.

Key Words: dairy cow • free-stall flooring material • behavior • temperature–humidity index




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J DAIRY SCIHome page
C. B. Tucker, D. M. Weary, M. A. G. von Keyserlingk, and K. A. Beauchemin
Cow comfort in tie-stalls: Increased depth of shavings or straw bedding increases lying time
J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2009; 92(6): 2684 - 2690.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.