HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Interpretive Summary Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Smith, T. R. Articles by Pogue, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Smith, T. R. Articles by Pogue, D.

Evaporative Tunnel Cooling of Dairy Cows in the Southeast. II: Impact on Lactation Performance¹

T. R. Smith^*,2, A. Chapa^*, S. Willard^*, C. Herndon, Jr., R. J. Williams^*, J. Crouch^*, T. Riley and D. Pogue

^* Department of Animal and Dairy Sciences, and
Department of Agricultural Economics, Mississippi State University, Starkville 39762
North Mississippi Branch Experiment Station, Holly Springs 38635

² Corresponding author: TRSmith{at}ads.msstate.edu

Heat stress has a dramatic impact on the dairy industry, reducing production and profitability throughout the southeastern United States. In many regions, management techniques can be used to mitigate the effects of heat stress, but available cooling technologies are often overwhelmed by the conditions of chronic heat stress present in southeastern United States. Although combining tunnel ventilation and evaporative cooling (evaporative tunnel cooling) seems to provide superior cooling for dairy cows, there is a dearth of reports on the impact of this technology on milk production. A model evaporative tunnel cooling facility in northern Mississippi was studied using 2 groups of 10 lactating Holstein cows housed in the tunnel barn and 2 groups of 10 matched herdmates housed in an adjacent naturally ventilated free-stall barn. Two 10-wk trials were performed in 2 yr beginning June 25, 2001, and May 26, 2003, in which cows housed outside were cooled by traditional fans and shade alone (2003) or with sprinklers (2001). In both years, the use of evaporative tunnel cooling decreased exposure to conditions of moderate heat stress by 84%. Cows cooled by evaporative tunnel ventilation increased feed intake by 12 and 11% over cows housed outside in 2001 and 2003, respectively. Evaporative tunnel cooling had no effect on milk composition, but increased milk yield over the 10-wk trial by 2.6 ± 0.27 and 2.8 ± 0.19 kg/cow per day in 2001 and 2003, respectively. In addition, somatic cell count was decreased 27 to 49% by evaporative tunnel cooling. Thus, under the range of environmental conditions present, evaporative tunnel cooling reliably reduced exposure to conditions of heat stress and improved milk production of lactating dairy cows during the summer season.

Key Words: heat stress • tunnel ventilation • evaporative cooling • milk yield

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. R. Smith, A. Chapa, S. Willard, C. Herndon Jr., R. J. Williams, J. Crouch, T. Riley, and D. Pogue Evaporative tunnel cooling of dairy cows in the southeast. I: effect on body temperature and respiration rate. J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2006; 89(10): 3904 - 3914. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]