JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Interpretive Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Magnusson, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kolstrup, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Magnusson, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kolstrup, C.
J. Dairy Sci. 89:3866-3875
© American Dairy Science Association, 2006.

Effect of Different Premilking Manual Teat-Cleaning Methods on Bacterial Spores in Milk

M. Magnusson*,1, A. Christiansson{dagger}, B. Svensson{dagger} and C. Kolstrup*

* Department of Agricultural Biosystems and Technology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-230 53 Alnarp, Sweden
{dagger} Swedish Dairy Association, Research and Development Department, SE-223 63 Lund, Sweden

1 Corresponding author: madeleine.magnusson{at}jbt.slu.se

Different teat-cleaning methods were evaluated to determine their effect on the presence of spores from anaerobic bacterial spore-formers in the milk. Artificial contamination was used to achieve uniform contamination of teats to reduce the number of cows and samples needed in the experiments and still obtain adequate power to detect differences among tested methods. Teats were contaminated experimentally with a large amount of Clostridium tyrobutyricum spores in a manure–water slurry. Various types of dry and moistened towels and different combinations of methods using soap or 2 types of towels, together with cleaning times of 10 or 20 s, were compared in 2 Latin square-designed experiments with 7 cows, 7 treatments, and 4 replications in each experiment. In comparison with control (no cleaning and no forestripping), cleaning teats with dry paper towels for 10 s reduced concentration of spores in milk by 45 to 50%. A 50 to 74% reduction was achieved using different types of moist towels for 10 s. Methods using 2 towels, soap, or a longer cleaning time reduced bacterial contamination by 85 to 91%. The most effective methods in reducing milk spore content (96% reduction) were use of a moist washable towel with or without soap followed by drying with a dry paper towel, for a total time of 20 s per cow. One of the best cleaning methods was studied in an additional experiment to determine the effect of different teat contamination mixtures. The Latin square-designed experiment with 8 cows, 8 treatments, and 2 replications showed that cleaning was independent of the tested contamination matrix (manure, soil, or sawdust), type of spores (Cl. tyrobutyricum and Bacillus cereus), or degree of contamination (manure or extra manure).

Key Words: premilking teat cleaning • Clostridium tyrobutyricum spore • Bacillus cereus spore • milk quality




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. A. Munoz, G. J. Bennett, C. Ahlstrom, H. M. Griffiths, Y. H. Schukken, and R. N. Zadoks
Cleanliness Scores as Indicator of Klebsiella Exposure in Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2008; 91(10): 3908 - 3916.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. Magnusson, B. Svensson, C. Kolstrup, and A. Christiansson
Bacillus cereus in Free-Stall Bedding
J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2007; 90(12): 5473 - 5482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. Magnusson, A. Christiansson, and B. Svensson
Bacillus cereus Spores During Housing of Dairy Cows: Factors Affecting Contamination of Raw Milk
J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2007; 90(6): 2745 - 2754.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.