| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Animal Welfare Program, Faculty of Land and Food Systems, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada V6T 1Z4
1 Corresponding author: jmhuzzey{at}interchange.ubc.ca
The objectives of this study were to: 1) evaluate how stocking density at the feed bunk affects feeding and social behavior of dairy cows; and 2) determine if this effect is further influenced by the type of feed barrier used. Thirty-six lactating Holstein cows, allotted to 4 groups, were subjected to each of 4 stocking density treatments and 2 feed barrier treatments. Initially, 2 groups were assigned to a headlock barrier, and 2 groups to a post-and-rail barrier. Each group was then exposed to 4 stocking density treatments (0.81, 0.61, 0.41, and 0.21 m/cow, corresponding to 1.33, 1.00, 0.67, and 0.33 headlocks/cow), in 4 successive 10-d treatment periods. After these periods, the feed barriers were switched between groups and the 4 stocking density treatments were readministered. Time-lapse video was used to quantify feeding, standing, and aggressive behavior at the feed bunk. Daily feeding times were greater and duration of inactive standing in the feeding area was less when using a post-and-rail compared with a headlock feed barrier. Feeding time decreased and inactive standing increased for both barrier designs as stocking density increased at the feed bunk. Cows were displaced more often from the feeding area when the stocking density was increased, and this effect was greater for cows using the post-and-rail feed barrier. Cows ranked lower in the social hierarchy at the feed bunk were displaced more often when feeding at a post-and-rail barrier, particularly at high stocking densities. Therefore, we recommend avoiding overstocking at the feed bunk to increase feeding activity and reduce competition. Use of a barrier that provides some physical separation between adjacent cows, such as a headlock feed barrier, can be used to further reduce competition at the feed bunk.
Key Words: feed barrier • stocking density • feeding behavior • social behavior
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  K. L. Proudfoot, D. M. Veira, D. M. Weary, and M. A. G. von Keyserlingk Competition at the feed bunk changes the feeding, standing, and social behavior of transition dairy cows J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2009; 92(7): 3116 - 3123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. E. Fernandez, R. A. Marino, and X. C. Carreira Algorithms for dairy barn design: Maternity and milking areas J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2009; 92(5): 2276 - 2296. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. M. Weary, J. M. Huzzey, and M. A. G. von Keyserlingk BOARD-INVITED REVIEW: Using behavior to predict and identify ill health in animals J Anim Sci, February 1, 2009; 87(2): 770 - 777. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. O'Driscoll, A. Hanlon, and L. Boyle The Effect of Out-Wintering Pad Design on the Synchrony of Dairy Cow Behavior J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2008; 91(12): 4651 - 4660. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Val-Laillet, D. M. Veira, and M. A. G. von Keyserlingk Short Communication: Dominance in Free-Stall-Housed Dairy Cattle Is Dependent upon Resource J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2008; 91(10): 3922 - 3926. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Bach, N. Valls, A. Solans, and T. Torrent Associations Between Nondietary Factors and Dairy Herd Performance J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2008; 91(8): 3259 - 3267. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. A. Gonzalez, A. Ferret, X. Manteca, J. L. Ruiz-de-la-Torre, S. Calsamiglia, M. Devant, and A. Bach Performance, behavior, and welfare of Friesian heifers housed in pens with two, four, and eight individuals per concentrate feeding place J Anim Sci, June 1, 2008; 86(6): 1446 - 1458. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. A. G. von Keyserlingk, D. Olenick, and D. M. Weary Acute Behavioral Effects of Regrouping Dairy Cows J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2008; 91(3): 1011 - 1016. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Hosseinkhani, T. J. DeVries, K. L. Proudfoot, R. Valizadeh, D. M. Veira, and M. A. G. von Keyserlingk The Effects of Feed Bunk Competition on the Feed Sorting Behavior of Close-Up Dry Cows J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2008; 91(3): 1115 - 1121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. A. Gonzalez, A. Ferret, X. Manteca, J. L. Ruiz-de-la-Torre, S. Calsamiglia, M. Devant, and A. Bach Effect of the number of concentrate feeding places per pen on performance, behavior, and welfare indicators of Friesian calves during the first month after arrival at the feedlot J Anim Sci, February 1, 2008; 86(2): 419 - 431. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Chapinal, D. M. Veira, D. M. Weary, and M. A. G. von Keyserlingk Technical Note: Validation of a System for Monitoring Individual Feeding and Drinking Behavior and Intake in Group-Housed Cattle J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2007; 90(12): 5732 - 5736. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. M. Huzzey, D. M. Veira, D. M. Weary, and M. A. G. von Keyserlingk Prepartum Behavior and Dry Matter Intake Identify Dairy Cows at Risk for Metritis J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2007; 90(7): 3220 - 3233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. A. Fregonesi, C. B. Tucker, and D. M. Weary Overstocking Reduces Lying Time in Dairy Cows J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2007; 90(7): 3349 - 3354. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. J. DeVries and M. A. G. von Keyserlingk Feed stalls affect the social and feeding behavior of lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2006; 89(9): 3522 - 3531. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. L. Mentink and N. B. Cook Short Communication: Feed Bunk Utilization in Dairy Cows Housed in Pens with Either Two or Three Rows of Free Stalls J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2006; 89(1): 134 - 138. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
