| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1 Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA) and Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentàries, IRTA-Unitat de Remugants, Barcelona, Spain
2 Departament de Ciència Animal i dels Aliments Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
3 Department of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108
Corresponding author: M. D. Stern; e-mail: stern002{at}umn.edu.
Protein metabolism in the rumen is the result of metabolic activity of ruminal microorganisms. The structure of the protein is a key factor in determining its susceptibility to microbial proteases and, thus, its degradability. Ruminal protein degradation is affected by pH and the predominant species of microbial population. Ruminal proteolytic activity decreases as pH decreases with high-forage dairy cattle-type rations, but not in high-concentrate beef-type rations. Accumulation of amino acid (AA) N after feeding suggests that AA uptake by rumen microorganisms could be the limiting factor of protein degradation in the rumen. In addition, there are several AA, such as Phe, Leu, and Ile, that are synthesized by rumen microorganisms with greater difficulty than other AA. The most common assessment of efficiency of microbial protein synthesis (EMPS) is determination of grams of microbial N per unit of rumen available energy, typically expressed as true organic matter or carbohydrates fermented. However, EMPS is unable to estimate the efficiency at which bacteria capture available N in the rumen. An alternative and complementary measure of microbial protein synthesis is the efficiency of N use (ENU). In contrast to EMPS, ENU is a good measurement for describing efficiency of N capture by ruminal microbes. Using EMPS and ENU, it was concluded that optimum bacterial growth in the rumen occurs when EMPS is 29 g of bacterial N/kg of fermented organic matter, and ENU is 69%, implying that bacteria would require about 1.31 x rumen-available N per unit of bacterial N. Because the distribution of N within bacterial cells changes with rate of fermentation, AA N, rather than total bacterial N should be used to express microbial protein synthesis.
Key Words: rumen • nitrogen • metabolism • microbial
Abbreviation key: CHO = carbohydrate, EMPS = efficiency of microbial protein synthesis, ENU = efficiency of N utilization, FOM = fermented OM, TDN = total digestible nutrients
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  D. S. Pina, S. C. Valadares Filho, L. O. Tedeschi, A. M. Barbosa, and R. F. D. Valadares Influence of different levels of concentrate and ruminally undegraded protein on digestive variables in beef heifers J Anim Sci, March 1, 2009; 87(3): 1058 - 1067. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Cantalapiedra-Hijar, D. R. Yanez-Ruiz, A. I. Martin-Garcia, and E. Molina-Alcaide Effects of forage:concentrate ratio and forage type on apparent digestibility, ruminal fermentation, and microbial growth in goats J Anim Sci, February 1, 2009; 87(2): 622 - 631. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. C. Taylor-Edwards, G. Hibbard, S. E. Kitts, K. R. McLeod, D. E. Axe, E. S. Vanzant, N. B. Kristensen, and D. L. Harmon Effects of slow-release urea on ruminal digesta characteristics and growth performance in beef steers J Anim Sci, January 1, 2009; 87(1): 200 - 208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. A. Cole and R. W. Todd Opportunities to enhance performance and efficiency through nutrient synchrony in concentrate-fed ruminants J Anim Sci, April 1, 2008; 86(14_suppl): E318 - E333. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Calsamiglia, P. W. Cardozo, A. Ferret, and A. Bach Changes in rumen microbial fermentation are due to a combined effect of type of diet and pH J Anim Sci, March 1, 2008; 86(3): 702 - 711. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. L. Moody, G. I. Zanton, J. M. Daubert, and A. J. Heinrichs Nutrient Utilization of Differing Forage-to-Concentrate Ratios by Growing Holstein Heifers J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2007; 90(12): 5580 - 5586. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Hu, M. R. Murphy, P. D. Constable, and E. Block Dietary Cation-Anion Difference and Dietary Protein Effects on Performance and Acid-Base Status of Dairy Cows in Early Lactation J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2007; 90(7): 3355 - 3366. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Hu, M. R. Murphy, P. D. Constable, and E. Block Dietary Cation-Anion Difference Effects on Performance and Acid-Base Status of Dairy Cows Postpartum J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2007; 90(7): 3367 - 3375. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. M. Maesoomi, G. R. Ghorbani, M. Alikhani, and A. Nikkhah Short Communication: Canola Meal as a Substitute for Cottonseed Meal in Diet of Midlactation Holsteins J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2006; 89(5): 1673 - 1677. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. L. Firkins, A. N. Hristov, M. B. Hall, G. A. Varga, and N. R. St-Pierre Integration of Ruminal Metabolism in Dairy Cattle J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2006; 89(e_suppl_1): E31 - E51. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
