JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Interpretive Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, N. I.
Right arrow Articles by Ingvartsen, K. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, N. I.
Right arrow Articles by Ingvartsen, K. L.
J. Dairy Sci. 88:3186-3200
© American Dairy Science Association, 2005.

Quarter Health, Milking Interval, and Sampling Time During Milking Affect the Concentration of Milk Constituents

N. I. Nielsen, T. Larsen, M. Bjerring and K. L. Ingvartsen

Department of Animal Health, Welfare and Nutrition, Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Research Centre Foulum, P.O. Box 50, 8830 Tjele, Denmark

Corresponding author: Nicolaj I. Nielsen; e-mail: Nicolaj.Nielsen{at}agrsci.dk.

Eleven Danish Holstein cows were used to examine the effects of quarter health (healthy vs. unhealthy), milking interval (12 vs. 6 h), and sampling time during milking on the concentration of 8 milk constituents [acetone, ß-hydroxybutyrate (BHBA), N-acetyl-ß-D-glucosaminidase (NAGase), somatic cell count (SCC), urea, fat, protein, and lactose]. The selection criterion was that each cow should have 2 or 3 healthy and 1 or 2 unhealthy quarters. Foremilk was collected before attaching the teat cups of the milking machinery, and thereafter, milk samples were collected automatically from each quarter every 45 s during milking. Compared with milk from healthy quarters, milk from unhealthy quarters had a higher concentration of BHBA, NAGase, SCC, and protein during the entire milking, whereas urea was higher in the last part of the milking process. Healthy quarters had a higher content of acetone and lactose during the whole milking, whereas fat was higher in the first part of the milking process. When the cows were milked at the 6-h interval, all milk constituents except lactose and protein were higher during the whole (NAGase, SCC, and urea) or part of the milking (acetone, BHBA, and fat) compared with when cows were milked at the 12-h interval. Lactose was higher in the first part of the milking at the 12-h compared with the 6-h interval, whereas protein was not affected by milking interval. ß-Hydroxybutyrate, NAGase, SCC, and fat increased during the milking process, whereas acetone, urea, protein, and lactose decreased. Foremilk was remarkably different for all constituents, except acetone, and should not be used as a representative milk sample to achieve the true level of a milk constituent. If these milk constituents are to be used in an inline management system, these effects should be taken into account.

Key Words: milking interval • quarter health • milk fraction • in-line sampling

Abbreviation key: CMT = California mastitis test




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
J. Wu, S. Hu, and L. Cao
Therapeutic Effect of Nisin Z on Subclinical Mastitis in Lactating Cows
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., September 1, 2007; 51(9): 3131 - 3135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
R. G. M. Olde Riekerink, H. W. Barkema, W. Veenstra, F. E. Berg, H. Stryhn, and R. N. Zadoks
Somatic Cell Count During and Between Milkings
J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2007; 90(8): 3733 - 3741.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
D. B. Carlson, J. W. McFadden, A. D'Angelo, J. C. Woodworth, and J. K. Drackley
Dietary L-Carnitine Affects Periparturient Nutrient Metabolism and Lactation in Multiparous Cows
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2007; 90(7): 3422 - 3441.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.