JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Interpretive Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Endres, M. I.
Right arrow Articles by Weary, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Endres, M. I.
Right arrow Articles by Weary, D. M.
J. Dairy Sci. 88:2377-2380
© American Dairy Science Association, 2005.

Short Communication: Effect of Feed Barrier Design on the Behavior of Loose-Housed Lactating Dairy Cows

M. I. Endres1, T. J. DeVries2, M. A. G. von Keyserlingk2 and D. M. Weary2

1 Department of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108
2 Animal Welfare Program, The University of British Columbia, 2357 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada

Corresponding author: Marcia Endres; e-mail: miendres{at}umn.edu.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of 2 feed barrier systems on feeding and social behavior of dairy cows. Forty-eight lactating Holstein cows were subjected to each of 2 treatments in a cross-over design. The treatments were 2 types of feed-line barriers: 1) post-and-rail, and 2) headlock. Time-lapse video was used to quantify the feeding behavior and incidence of aggressive displacements of the cows at the feed bunk. Average daily feeding time did not differ when cows used the headlock barrier compared with the post-and-rail barrier. However, there were certain changes in feeding time during periods of peak feeding activity: cows that had lower feeding times relative to group mates when using the post-and-rail barrier showed more similar feeding times to group mates when using the headlock barrier. There were 21% fewer displacements at the feed bunk when cows accessed feed by the headlock barrier compared with the post-and-rail barrier. These results suggest that using a headlock barrier reduces aggression at the feed bunk and improves access to feed for socially subordinate cows during peak feeding periods.

Key Words: feed barrier • feeding behavior • dairy cow




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J DAIRY SCIHome page
T. J. DeVries and M. A. G. von Keyserlingk
Feed stalls affect the social and feeding behavior of lactating dairy cows.
J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2006; 89(9): 3522 - 3531.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. M. Huzzey, T. J. DeVries, P. Valois, and M. A. G. von Keyserlingk
Stocking Density and Feed Barrier Design Affect the Feeding and Social Behavior of Dairy Cattle
J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2006; 89(1): 126 - 133.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J DAIRY SCIHome page
R. L. Mentink and N. B. Cook
Short Communication: Feed Bunk Utilization in Dairy Cows Housed in Pens with Either Two or Three Rows of Free Stalls
J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2006; 89(1): 134 - 138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J DAIRY SCIHome page
T. J. DeVries, M. A. G. von Keyserlingk, and K. A. Beauchemin
Frequency of Feed Delivery Affects the Behavior of Lactating Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2005; 88(10): 3553 - 3562.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.