JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Interpretive Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hinrichs, D.
Right arrow Articles by Kalm, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hinrichs, D.
Right arrow Articles by Kalm, E.
J. Dairy Sci. 88:2260-2268
© American Dairy Science Association, 2005.

Genetic Analyses of Mastitis Data Using Animal Threshold Models and Genetic Correlation with Production Traits

D. Hinrichs, E. Stamer, W. Junge and E. Kalm

Institute of Animal Breeding and Husbandry, Christian-Albrechts-University, D-24098 Kiel, Germany

Corresponding author: D. Hinrichs; e-mail: dhinrichs{at}tierzucht.uni-kiel.de.

In the present study, 6 different mastitis data sets of 3 dairy herds with an overall herd size of 3200 German Holstein cows were analyzed. Data collection periods included the first 50, 100, or 300 d of lactation. The 3 data collection periods were analyzed with a lactation model and a test-day model. All models were animal threshold models. Mastitis frequencies in the lactation model data sets varied between 29 and 45%, and varied between 3 and 6% in the test-day model data sets. Depending on the period of data collection, heritabilities of liability to mastitis in the lactation models were 0.05 (50 d), 0.06 (100 d), and 0.07 (300 d). In the test-day models, heritabilities were slightly higher with values of 0.09 (50 and 100 d), and 0.06 (300 d). Between lactation models, the rank correlations between the relative breeding values were high and varied between 0.86 and 0.94. Rank correlations between the relative breeding values of the test-day models ranged from 0.68 to 0.87. The rank correlations between the relative breeding values of lactation models and test-day models varied from 0.51 and 0.80. Genetic correlations between mastitis and milk production traits were estimated with a linear animal test-day model. The correlations with mastitis were 0.29 (milk yield), 0.30 (fat yield), 0.20 (fat content), 0.34 (protein yield), and 0.20 (protein content). The estimated genetic correlation between mastitis and somatic cell score was 0.84.

Key Words: mastitis • lactation model • test-day model • animal threshold model




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. A. D. R. N. Appuhamy, B. G. Cassell, C. D. Dechow, and J. B. Cole
Phenotypic Relationships of Common Health Disorders in Dairy Cows to Lactation Persistency Estimated from Daily Milk Weights
J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2007; 90(9): 4424 - 4434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
J. Bennewitz, O. Morgades, R. Preisinger, G. Thaller, and E. Kalm
Variance Component and Breeding Value Estimation for Reproductive Traits in Laying Hens Using a Bayesian Threshold Model
Poult. Sci., May 1, 2007; 86(5): 823 - 828.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
E. Carlen, U. Emanuelson, and E. Strandberg
Genetic evaluation of mastitis in dairy cattle using linear models, threshold models, and survival analysis: a simulation study.
J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2006; 89(10): 4049 - 4057.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
B. Harder, J. Bennewitz, D. Hinrichs, and E. Kalm
Genetic parameters for health traits and their relationship to different persistency traits in German Holstein dairy cattle.
J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2006; 89(8): 3202 - 3212.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.