HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Interpretive Summary Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Banos, G. Articles by Brotherstone, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Banos, G. Articles by Brotherstone, S.

Modeling Daily Energy Balance of Dairy Cows in the First Three Lactations

¹ Department of Animal Production, School of Veterinary Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, GR-54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
² Sustainable Livestock Systems, Scottish Agricultural College, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian, EH26 0PH, United Kingdom
³ Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Ashworth Laboratories, King’s Buildings, Edinburgh, EH9 3JT, United Kingdom

Corresponding author: G. Banos; e-mail: banos{at}vet.auth.gr.

Daily energy balance was calculated for 111 Holstein cows in their first 3 lactations, based on combinations of smoothed preadjusted phenotypic records for milk yield, feed intake, live weight, and body condition score. Two energy balance traits were defined: one based on milk yield and feed intake (EB1) and the other on live weight and body condition score change (EB2). Bessel functions (BF), Legendre polynomials (LP), sinusoidal functions (SF), and cubic splines (CS) were used to model energy balance within and across lactations. Models with BF or LP fitted fixed regressions of order 1 to 6 and random regressions of order 1 to 10. Cubic splines were fitted at 5 to 30 equally spaced knot points. In within-lactation analyses with BF and LP models, likelihood ratio tests revealed that the fit improved significantly up to random regression order of 5 for EB1 and 4 for EB2, independently of the fixed regression order. For EB1 analyses with LP, improvement was marginal albeit significant even for higher random regression order. For CS models, optimal number of knot points was 13 and 12 for EB1 and EB2, respectively. Residual variance and comparisons between actual and predicted energy balance showed that LP of minimum order 8 and 5 modeled, respectively, EB1 and EB2 better than the other 3 functions. In across-lactation analyses with BF and LP models, likelihood ratio tests were significant as the random regression order increased, for any order of the fixed regression. For CS models, optimal number of knot points was 14 and 16 for EB1 and EB2, respectively. Residual variance and comparisons between actual and predicted energy balance showed that models fitting CS and high (>8) random order BF or LP provided the best fit to both traits. However, in an across-lactation analysis, even higher order of LP or BF will be required to provide as good a fit as within-lactation analyses.

Key Words: energy balance • model functions • dairy cattle

Abbreviation key: BF = Bessel functions, CS = cubic splines, EB1 = energy balance calculated from feed intake and milk yield, EB2 = energy balance calculated from changes in live weight and BCS, LP = Legendre polynomials, SF = sinusoidal functions.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. C. Friggens, P. Berg, P. Theilgaard, I. R. Korsgaard, K. L. Ingvartsen, P. Lovendahl, and J. Jensen Breed and Parity Effects on Energy Balance Profiles Through Lactation: Evidence of Genetically Driven Body Energy Change J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2007; 90(11): 5291 - 5305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. R. Roche, D. P. Berry, J. M. Lee, K. A. Macdonald, and R. C. Boston Describing the Body Condition Score Change Between Successive Calvings: A Novel Strategy Generalizable to Diverse Cohorts J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2007; 90(9): 4378 - 4396. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]