JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Interpretive Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Andersen-Ranberg, I. M.
Right arrow Articles by Klemetsdal, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Andersen-Ranberg, I. M.
Right arrow Articles by Klemetsdal, G.
J. Dairy Sci. 88:2190-2198
© American Dairy Science Association, 2005.

Comparison Between Bivariate Models for 56-Day Nonreturn and Interval from Calving to First Insemination in Norwegian Red

I. M. Andersen-Ranberg1,2, B. Heringstad1,2, D. Gianola1,3, Y. M. Chang3 and G. Klemetsdal1

1 Department of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, N-1432 Ås, Norway
2 GENO Breeding and AI Association, N-1432 Ås, Norway
3 Department of Dairy Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706

Corresponding author: I. M. Andersen-Ranberg; e-mail: ina.ranberg{at}umb.no.

A bivariate threshold-linear (TL) and a bivariate linear-linear (LL) model were assessed for the genetic analysis of 56-d nonreturn (NR56) and interval from calving to first insemination (CFI) in first-lactation Norwegian Red (former Norwegian Dairy Cattle) (NRF). Three different datasets were used to infer genetic parameters and to predict transmitting abilities for NRF sires. Mean progeny group sizes were 147.8, 102.7, and 56.5 daughters, and the corresponding number of sires were 746, 743, and 742 in the 3 datasets. Otherwise, the structures of the 3 datasets were similar. When the TL model was used, heritability of liability to NR56 was 2.8% in the 2 larger datasets and 3.8% in the smallest dataset. In the LL model, the heritability of NR56 in the largest dataset and in the 2 smaller datasets was 1.2 and 0.9%, respectively. For CFI, the heritability was similar in TL and LL models, ranging from 2.4 to 2.7%. The small heritability of the 2 reproductive traits implies that most of the variation is environmental and that large progeny groups are required to get accurate sire PTA. The point estimates of the genetic correlation between NR56 and CFI were near zero in both models. The 2 bivariate models were compared in terms of predictive ability using logistic regression and a {chi}2 statistic based on differences between observed and predicted outcomes for NR56 in a separate dataset. Comparison was also with respect to ranking of sires and correlations between sire posterior means (TL model) and PTA (LL model). We found very small differences in ability to predict NR56 between the 2 bivariate models, regardless of the dataset used. Correlations between sire posterior means (TL) and sire PTA (LL) and rank correlations between sire evaluations were all >0.98 in the 3 datasets. At present, the LL model is preferred for sire evaluations of NR56 and CFI in NRF. This is because the LL model is less computationally demanding and more robust with respect to the structure of the data than TL.

Key Words: female fertility • genetic parameter • model comparison • bivariate threshold model

Abbreviation key: CFI = interval from calving to first insemination, LL = linear-linear, MCMC = Markov chain Monte Carlo, NR56 = 56-d nonreturn rate, NRF = Norwegian Red, TL = threshold-linear.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
C. Sun, P. Madsen, U. S. Nielsen, Y. Zhang, M. S. Lund, and G. Su
Comparison between a sire model and an animal model for genetic evaluation of fertility traits in Danish Holstein population
J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2009; 92(8): 4063 - 4071.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
S. Konig, Y. M. Chang, U. U. v. Borstel, D. Gianola, and H. Simianer
Genetic and Phenotypic Relationships Among Milk Urea Nitrogen, Fertility, and Milk Yield in Holstein Cows
J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2008; 91(11): 4372 - 4382.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. Holtsmark, B. Heringstad, P. Madsen, and J. Odegard
Genetic Relationship Between Culling, Milk Production, Fertility, and Health Traits in Norwegian Red Cows
J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2008; 91(10): 4006 - 4012.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
S. Konig, X. L. Wu, D. Gianola, B. Heringstad, and H. Simianer
Exploration of Relationships Between Claw Disorders and Milk Yield in Holstein Cows via Recursive Linear and Threshold Models
J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2008; 91(1): 395 - 406.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. T. Kuhn, J. L. Hutchison, and G. R. Wiggans
Characterization of Holstein Heifer Fertility in the United States
J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2006; 89(12): 4907 - 4920.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
B. Heringstad, I. M. Andersen-Ranberg, Y. M. Chang, and D. Gianola
Short communication: Genetic analysis of nonreturn rate and mastitis in first-lactation Norwegian Red cows.
J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2006; 89(11): 4420 - 4423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
B. Heringstad, Y. M. Chang, I. M. Andersen-Ranberg, and D. Gianola
Genetic analysis of number of mastitis cases and number of services to conception using a censored threshold model.
J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2006; 89(10): 4042 - 4048.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
Y. M. Chang, I. M. Andersen-Ranberg, B. Heringstad, D. Gianola, and G. Klemetsdal
Bivariate Analysis of Number of Services to Conception and Days Open in Norwegian Red Using a Censored Threshold-Linear Model
J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2006; 89(2): 772 - 778.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.