JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Interpretive Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spörndly, E.
Right arrow Articles by Wredle, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Spörndly, E.
Right arrow Articles by Wredle, E.
J. Dairy Sci. 88:1711-1722
© American Dairy Science Association, 2005.

Automatic Milking and Grazing—Effects of Location of Drinking Water on Water Intake, Milk Yield, and Cow Behavior

E. Spörndly and E. Wredle

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Kungsängen Research Center, SE-753 23 Uppsala, Sweden

Corresponding author: Eva Spörndly; e-mail: Eva.Sporndly{at}huv.slu.se.

In an automatic milking system with cows grazing on a mixed grass sward, experiments were performed in 2001 and 2003, lasting 10 and 7 wk, respectively. Two location strategies for offering drinking water were compared: available in the barn and in the field (group B+F) or only in the barn (group B). During 2001, cows grazed alternately at 2 pastures at different distances from the barn, 50 m (near pasture) or 330 m (distant pasture), whereas the distant pasture was mainly used in 2003. No significant differences in milk yield, milking frequency, or milk composition were found between the 2 treatments. Average milk yield in the 2 experiments was 26.8 and 27.6 kg of milk in 2001 and 2003, respectively, and average milking frequency was 2.4 milkings/ d. Significant differences in animal behavior were observed only during the period when animals grazed on the distant pasture in 2001, with animals in group B+F spending 40% of their time on pasture and 21% of their time grazing, whereas corresponding values for group B were 34 and 17%, respectively. In 2003, average drinking water intakes per cow were 53 L/d on treatment B and 51 L/d on treatment B+F, and were not significantly different. Total daily water intake including water in the pasture was approximately 90 L/cow. In conclusion, no significant differences in milk yield, milking frequency, or water intake were found between cows offered drinking water both in the barn and in the field compared with drinking water only in the barn at pasture distances up to 330 m.

Key Words: automatic milking • grazing • water supply • milk production

Abbreviation key: AMS = automatic milking system, B = drinking water in barn, B+F = drinking water available in barn and field, DP = distant pasture (~330 m from barn), NP = near pasture (~50 m from barn)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
K. M. Svennersten-Sjaunja and G. Pettersson
Pros and cons of automatic milking in Europe
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2008; 86(13_suppl): 37 - 46.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.