JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Interpretive Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Vries, A.
Right arrow Articles by Risco, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Vries, A.
Right arrow Articles by Risco, C. A.
J. Dairy Sci. 88:948-956
© American Dairy Science Association, 2005.

Pregnancy Rates and Milk Production in Natural Service and Artificially Inseminated Dairy Herds in Florida and Georgia*

A. de Vries1, C. Steenholdt2,{dagger} and C. A. Risco2

1 Department of Animal Sciences, and
2 Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville 32611

Corresponding author: Carlos Risco; e-mail: riscoc{at}mail.vetmed.ufl.edu.

Effects of artificial insemination (AI) and natural service (NS) breeding systems on pregnancy rates (PR) by stage of lactation, season, and changes in milk production over time were examined using lactation and herd DHIA records of Holstein cows in dairy herds located in Florida and Georgia. The reported genetic profile of service sires of the herd was used to determine the percentage of cows bred to natural service bulls (%NS). Two seasons were considered: winter (November–April) and summer (May–October) from 1995 to 2002 (16 periods). Herd-periods were assigned 1 of 3 breeding systems: AI (0 to 10% NS), mixed (11 to 89% NS) and NS (90 to 100% NS). Seventy percent of the herds used NS bulls as a component of their breeding system during the study period. The PR during winter (17.9%) was greater than that during summer (9.0%). During winter, PR for AI herds (17.9%) did not differ from that for mixed (17.8%) and NS herds (18.0%). During summer, PR for AI herds (8.1%) was slightly less than that for mixed (9.3%) and NS herds (9.8%). During winter, PR for cows at 71 to 91 d, 92 to 112 d, and 113 to 133 d in milk were 1.4% lower for mixed herds compared with AI and NS. Pregnancy rate for NS herds was 2.6% lower during late lactation compared with AI and mixed herds. During summer, PR for cows at 71 to 91 and 92 to 112 d in milk were 2.6 and 1.8% greater, respectively, for NS herds compared with AI. However, from 260 to 364 d in milk, PR for NS herds was less than that for AI and mixed herds. No significant interaction was detected between breeding system and lactation number. Rolling herd average milk production during the study period was less in the NS herds (7180 kg) compared with AI (8513 kg) and mixed herds (8176 kg), but the annual change in milk production was not different among breeding systems. The results indicated that use of NS bulls did not result in meaningful disadvantages in terms of PR and changes in milk production over time.

Key Words: pregnancy rate • milk production • natural service • artificial insemination

Abbreviation key: DRMS = Dairy Records Management Systems, NS = natural service breeding system, %NS = percentage natural service breedings, PR = pregnancy rate, VWP = voluntary waiting period




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
C. Huang, S. Tsuruta, J. K. Bertrand, I. Misztal, T. J. Lawlor, and J. S. Clay
Environmental Effects on Conception Rates of Holsteins in New York and Georgia
J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2008; 91(2): 818 - 825.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
Y. M. Chang, O. Gonzalez-Recio, K. A. Weigel, and P. M. Fricke
Genetic Analysis of the Twenty-One-Day Pregnancy Rate in US Holsteins Using an Ordinal Censored Threshold Model with Unknown Voluntary Waiting Period
J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2007; 90(4): 1987 - 1997.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
D. Z. Caraviello, K. A. Weigel, M. Craven, D. Gianola, N. B. Cook, K. V. Nordlund, P. M. Fricke, and M. C. Wiltbank
Analysis of Reproductive Performance of Lactating Cows on Large Dairy Farms Using Machine Learning Algorithms
J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2006; 89(12): 4703 - 4722.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.