JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Interpretive Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rastani, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Schwab, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rastani, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Schwab, M. C.
J. Dairy Sci. 88:1004-1014
© American Dairy Science Association, 2005.

Reducing Dry Period Length to Simplify Feeding Transition Cows: Milk Production, Energy Balance, and Metabolic Profiles

R. R. Rastani, R. R. Grummer, S. J. Bertics, A. Gümen, M. C. Wiltbank, D. G. Mashek and M. C. Schwab

Department of Dairy Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706

Corresponding author: R. R. Grummer; e-mail: rgrummer{at}wisc.edu.

Sixty-five Holstein cows were used to evaluate management schemes involving altered dry period (DP) lengths on subsequent milk production, energy balance (EB), and metabolic variables. Cows were assigned to one of 3 treatments: traditional 56-d DP (fed a low-energy diet from –56 to –29 d and a moderate energy diet from –28 d to parturition; T), 28-d DP (continuously fed a high energy diet; S), and no planned DP (continuously fed a high energy diet; N). Prepartum DM intake (DMI), measured from 56 d prepartum through parturition, was lower for cows on the T treatment than for cows on the S treatment and was higher for cows on the N treatment than for cows on the S treatment. There were no differences in prepartum plasma glucose, and ß-hydroxybutryric acid; there was a treatment by time interaction for prepartum plasma nonesterified fatty acid (NEFA). There was no difference in prepartum liver triglyceride (TG); postpartum liver TG was decreased for cows on the N treatment compared with cows on the S treatment, but was similar for cows on the T and S treatments. Postpartum NEFA was similar between cows on the T and S treatments, but was greater for cows on the S treatment than for cows on the N treatment. Postpartum glucose was greater for cows on the N treatment compared with cows on the S treatment and tended to be greater for cows on the S treatment than for cows on the T treatment. There was no difference in postpartum solids-corrected milk (SCM) production or DMI by cows on the T vs. S treatment. However, there was a tendency toward lower postpartum SCM production by cows on the N vs. S treatment and a tendency for greater postpartum DMI by cows on the N vs. S treatment. Postpartum EB was greater for cows on the S vs. T treatment and the N vs. S treatment. In general, T and S management schemes had similar effects on DMI, SCM, and metabolic variables in the first 70 d of the subsequent lactation. Eliminating the DP improved energy and metabolic status.

Key Words: dry period length • transition period • energy density

Abbreviation key: DP = dry period, DRY = contrast for DP length, EB = energy balance, HE = high energy, LE = low energy, ME = moderate energy, MGT = contrast for management scheme, N = no planned DP, NEI = net energy intake, NEM = net energy for maintenance, NEP = net energy for pregnancy, S = 28-d DP, T = 56-d DP, TG = triglyceride




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
T. H. Klusmeyer, A. C. Fitzgerald, A. C. Fabellar, J. M. Ballam, R. A. Cady, and J. L. Vicini
Effect of recombinant bovine somatotropin and a shortened or no dry period on the performance of lactating dairy cows
J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2009; 92(11): 5503 - 5511.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. S. Gulay, M. J. Hayen, H. H. Head, and K. C. Bachman
Short communication: Effect of estrogen supplemented at dry-off on temporal changes in concentrations of lactose in blood plasma of Holstein cows
J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2009; 92(8): 3815 - 3818.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
R. D. Watters, M. C. Wiltbank, J. N. Guenther, A. E. Brickner, R. R. Rastani, P. M. Fricke, and R. R. Grummer
Effect of dry period length on reproduction during the subsequent lactation
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2009; 92(7): 3081 - 3090.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
S. M. Godden, D. M. Haines, and D. Hagman
Improving passive transfer of immunoglobulins in calves. I: Dose effect of feeding a commercial colostrum replacer
J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2009; 92(4): 1750 - 1757.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
G. T. Church, L. K. Fox, C. T. Gaskins, D. D. Hancock, and J. M. Gay
The Effect of a Shortened Dry Period on Intramammary Infections During the Subsequent Lactation
J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2008; 91(11): 4219 - 4225.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
R. D. Watters, J. N. Guenther, A. E. Brickner, R. R. Rastani, P. M. Crump, P. W. Clark, and R. R. Grummer
Effects of Dry Period Length on Milk Production and Health of Dairy Cattle
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2008; 91(7): 2595 - 2603.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
E. L. Annen, C. M. Stiening, B. A. Crooker, A. C. Fitzgerald, and R. J. Collier
Effect of continuous milking and prostaglandin E2 on milk production and mammary epithelial cell turnover, ultrastructure, and gene expression
J Anim Sci, May 1, 2008; 86(5): 1132 - 1144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. J. Green, A. J. Bradley, G. F. Medley, and W. J. Browne
Cow, Farm, and Herd Management Factors in the Dry Period Associated with Raised Somatic Cell Counts in Early Lactation
J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2008; 91(4): 1403 - 1415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
L. A. Winkelman, T. H. Elsasser, and C. K. Reynolds
Limit-Feeding a High-Energy Diet to Meet Energy Requirements in the Dry Period Alters Plasma Metabolite Concentrations but Does Not Affect Intake or Milk Production in Early Lactation
J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2008; 91(3): 1067 - 1079.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
A. Pezeshki, J. Mehrzad, G. R. Ghorbani, H. R. Rahmani, R. J. Collier, and C. Burvenich
Effects of Short Dry Periods on Performance and Metabolic Status in Holstein Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2007; 90(12): 5531 - 5541.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
R. R. Rastani, N. S. Del Rio, T. F. Gressley, G. E. Dahl, and R. R. Grummer
Effects of Increasing Milking Frequency During the Last 28 Days of Gestation on Milk Production, Dry Matter Intake, and Energy Balance in Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2007; 90(4): 1729 - 1739.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. T. Kuhn, J. L. Hutchison, and H. D. Norman
Dry Period Length in US Jerseys: Characterization and Effects on Performance
J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2007; 90(4): 2069 - 2081.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. T. Kuhn, J. L. Hutchison, and H. D. Norman
Dry Period Length to Maximize Production Across Adjacent Lactations and Lifetime Production
J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2006; 89(5): 1713 - 1722.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. S. Gulay, M. J. Hayen, H. H. Head, C. J. Wilcox, and K. C. Bachman
Milk Production from Holstein Half Udders After Concurrent Thirty- and Seventy-Day Dry Periods
J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2005; 88(11): 3953 - 3962.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
A. Gumen, R. R. Rastani, R. R. Grummer, and M. C. Wiltbank
Reduced Dry Periods and Varying Prepartum Diets Alter Postpartum Ovulation and Reproductive Measures
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2005; 88(7): 2401 - 2411.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.