| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1 Department of Dairy Science and
2 Department of Biological Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706
Corresponding author: L. E. Armentano; e-mail: learment{at}wisc.edu.
Twenty lactating Holstein cows (5 primiparous and 15 multiparous) were used in a 5 x 5 Latin Square design, with 5 treatments and 3 periods of 21 d each. Diets contained 25% corn silage, 25% oat silage, and 50% concentrate (dry matter basis). The 5 treatments tested in the experiment were long oat silage (LOS), medium oat silage (MOS), fine from long oat silage (FLOS), fine from medium oat silage (FMOS), and half LOS plus half FLOS (LFLOS). The geometric mean particle length (GMPL) of the diets was 6.68, 5.19, 4.46, 4.35, and 5.39 mm for LOS, MOS, FLOS, FMOS, and LFLOS, respectively. The LFLOS was designed to provide dietary GMPL similar to MOS, but with a more bimodal particle size distribution (PSD). Linear and quadratic effects of GMPL were tested, based on the mean GMPL of the feed actually consumed (cGMPL). Contrasts were used to test for the effect of different PSD (MOS vs. LFLOS) and to test for differences between FMOS and FLOS, which would indicate unequal fermentations in the MOS and LOS silos. No differences were detected between FMOS and FLOS in most of the variables measured. Increasing cGMPL linearly decreased dry matter intake, milk production, and milk protein percentage and yield without affecting milk fat percentage, milk fat yield, ruminal pH, and ruminal volatile fatty acid concentration. Although cows fed diets with increasing cGMPL spent more time eating and chewing per day and per kilogram of dry matter intake, there was no effect of cGMPL on rumen pH. Feeding medium oat silage increased milk fat percentage and yield compared with feeding a mixture of long and fine oat silage.
Key Words: oat silage • particle size distribution • geometric mean particle length
Abbreviation key: cGMPL = geometric mean particle length of the diet consumed, dGMPL = dietary geometric mean particle length, FLOS = fine from long oat silage, FMOS = fine from medium oat silage, GMPL = geometric mean particle length, LFLOS = 50% long oat silage and 50% fine from long oat silage, LOS = long oat silage, MF = multiparous, fistulated, MOS = medium oat silage, NDFI = neutral detergent fiber intake, peNDF = physically effective neutral detergent fiber, PSD = particle size distribution
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. K. Bhandari, S. Li, K. H. Ominski, K. M. Wittenberg, and J. C. Plaizier Effects of the Chop Lengths of Alfalfa Silage and Oat Silage on Feed Intake, Milk Production, Feeding Behavior, and Rumen Fermentation of Dairy Cows J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2008; 91(5): 1942 - 1958. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q. Zebeli, J. Dijkstra, M. Tafaj, H. Steingass, B. N. Ametaj, and W. Drochner Modeling the Adequacy of Dietary Fiber in Dairy Cows Based on the Responses of Ruminal pH and Milk Fat Production to Composition of the Diet J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2008; 91(5): 2046 - 2066. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. J. DeVries, K. A. Beauchemin, and M. A. G. von Keyserlingk Dietary Forage Concentration Affects the Feed Sorting Behavior of Lactating Dairy Cows J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2007; 90(12): 5572 - 5579. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. J. Couderc, D. H. Rearte, G. F. Schroeder, J. I. Ronchi, and F. J. Santini Silage chop length and hay supplementation on milk yield, chewing activity, and ruminal digestion by dairy cows. J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2006; 89(9): 3599 - 3608. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Z. Yang and K. A. Beauchemin Increasing the physically effective fiber content of dairy cow diets may lower efficiency of feed use. J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2006; 89(7): 2694 - 2704. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q. Zebeli, M. Tafaj, H. Steingass, B. Metzler, and W. Drochner Effects of Physically Effective Fiber on Digestive Processes and Milk Fat Content in Early Lactating Dairy Cows Fed Total Mixed Rations J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2006; 89(2): 651 - 668. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
