|
|
||||||||
1 Institute of Animal Breeding and Genetics, University of Göttingen, Albrecht-Thaer-Weg 3, D-37075 Göttingen, Germany
2 Research Institute for the Biology of Farm Animals, Wilhelm-Stahl-Allee 2, D-18196 Dummerstorf, Germany
3 Institute of Animal Breeding and Husbandry with Veterinary Clinic, University of Halle, D-06099 Halle (Saale), Germany
Corresponding author: Hermann H. Swalve; e-mail: swalve{at}landw.uni-halle.de.
Genotype by environment interaction can be detected via the estimation of genetic correlations between environments under an animal model based on data comprising genetic links between the strata. Genetic correlations were estimated for protein yield of Holstein cows within and across regions of Germany using REML under an animal model for lactation and test-day records. Subsets of the entire data were created, stratified by region or herd size within region, and comprised between 16,307 and 132,972 cows with first-lactation records. Substantial heterogeneity exists between regions in Western and Eastern Germany. In Western states, most farms are small, with typical herd sizes of 30 to 60 cows, whereas in Eastern states, mostly large herds with herd sizes of 500 to 2000 cows are common. The results show drastic differences for residual and permanent environmental variance components between Eastern and Western regions with increases of around 30% for Eastern regions. Additive genetic variances were of similar magnitude in both regions. Genetic correlations between Eastern and Western states were between 0.90 and 0.95 but dropped to 0.79 when data from an Eastern state were reduced to contain large herds only. The results indicate that differences in herd size account for more of the differences in genetic correlation than do geographic regional differences.
Key Words: genotype x environment interaction large-scale farm small-scale farm milk production
Abbreviation key: EAST-1, EAST-2, WEST-1, WEST-2 = different data sets from Eastern and Western states within Germany
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Hammami, B. Rekik, C. Bastin, H. Soyeurt, J. Bormann, J. Stoll, and N. Gengler Environmental sensitivity for milk yield in Luxembourg and Tunisian Holsteins by herd management level J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2009; 92(9): 4604 - 4612. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Haile-Mariam, M. J. Carrick, and M. E. Goddard Genotype by Environment Interaction for Fertility, Survival, and Milk Production Traits in Australian Dairy Cattle J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2008; 91(12): 4840 - 4853. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Freyer, S. Konig, B. Fischer, U. Bergfeld, and B. G. Cassell Invited Review: Crossbreeding in Dairy Cattle From a German Perspective of the Past and Today J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2008; 91(10): 3725 - 3743. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Konig, X. L. Wu, D. Gianola, B. Heringstad, and H. Simianer Exploration of Relationships Between Claw Disorders and Milk Yield in Holstein Cows via Recursive Linear and Threshold Models J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2008; 91(1): 395 - 406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Konig, S. Lessner, and H. Simianer Application of Controlling Instruments for Improvements in Cow Sire Selection J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2007; 90(4): 1967 - 1980. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Bryant, N. Lopez-Villalobos, J. E. Pryce, C. W. Holmes, D. L. Johnson, and D. J. Garrick Environmental Sensitivity in New Zealand Dairy Cattle J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2007; 90(3): 1538 - 1547. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |