|
|
||||||||

Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824
Corresponding author: Michael S. Allen; e-mail: allenm{at}msu.edu.
Animal responses to dietary treatment may interact with metabolic state, which differs for cows across a wide range of milk yield. Responses to dietary saturated vs. unsaturated fatty acid (FA) supplement was evaluated using 32 multiparous Holstein cows arranged in a crossover design with 14-d periods. Treatments were 2.5% FA from unsaturated FA (calcium salts of palm FA) or saturated FA (prilled, hydrogenated free FA). Unsaturated FA treatments decreased dry matter intake (0.8 kg/d) and time spent ruminating (25 min/d) compared with saturated FA treatment. Treatments did not differ in milk or 3.5% fat-corrected milk yield. Intake and milk yield responses were not related to milk yield across cows. Saturated FA treatment increased milk protein and lactose concentrations, but treatment did not affect yield of milk components. Saturated FA treatment increased insulin over 25% and decreased nonesterified FA nearly 20% with no effect on plasma somatotropin, glucose, or ß-hydroxybutyrate concentrations. Milk protein concentration and yield responses to treatment were positively correlated with pretrial fat-corrected milk yield. Milk protein response was not related to insulin response, supporting the importance of insulin sensitivity in control of milk protein synthesis. Unsaturated FA treatment decreased dry matter intake and rumination time compared with saturated FA treatment, consistent with reports of unsaturated fat increasing satiety and decreasing gut motility. Decreased milk protein synthesis by fat supplementation may be related to FA saturation and milk yield of cows.
Key Words: fatty acid saturation milk protein feed intake
Abbreviation key: CCK = cholecystokinin, FA = fatty acid, GLP-1 = glucagon-like peptide-1, pFCMY = pre-trial fat-corrected milk yield, SAT = saturated fatty acids, ST = somatotropin, UNS = unsaturated fatty acids.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. K. Drackley, T. R. Overton, G. Ortiz-Gonzalez, A. D. Beaulieu, D. M. Barbano, J. M. Lynch, and E. G. Perkins Responses to Increasing Amounts of High-Oleic Sunflower Fatty Acids Infused into the Abomasum of Lactating Dairy Cows J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2007; 90(11): 5165 - 5175. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Voelker Linton and M. S. Allen Nutrient Demand Affects Ruminal Digestion Responses to a Change in Dietary Forage Concentration J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2007; 90(10): 4770 - 4779. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Moallem, M. Katz, A. Arieli, and H. Lehrer Effects of Peripartum Propylene Glycol or Fats Differing in Fatty Acid Profiles on Feed Intake, Production, and Plasma Metabolites in Dairy Cows J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2007; 90(8): 3846 - 3856. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. E. Relling and C. K. Reynolds Feeding Rumen-Inert Fats Differing in Their Degree of Saturation Decreases Intake and Increases Plasma Concentrations of Gut Peptides in Lactating Dairy Cows J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2007; 90(3): 1506 - 1515. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. J. Harvatine and M. S. Allen Effects of Fatty Acid supplements on milk yield and energy balance of lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2006; 89(3): 1081 - 1091. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. J. Harvatine and M. S. Allen Effects of Fatty Acid supplements on feed intake, and feeding and chewing behavior of lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2006; 89(3): 1104 - 1112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |