JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Interpretive Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lukas, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Reneau, J. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lukas, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Reneau, J. K.
J. Dairy Sci. 88:3944-3952
© American Dairy Science Association, 2005.

Bulk Tank Somatic Cell Counts Analyzed by Statistical Process Control Tools to Identify and Monitor Subclinical Mastitis Incidence

J. M. Lukas1, D. M. Hawkins2, M. L. Kinsel3 and J. K. Reneau1

1 Department of Animal Science, and
2 School of Statistics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108
3 Agricultural Information Management, Inc., Ellensburg, WA 98926

Corresponding author: Jeffrey K. Reneau; e-mail: renea001{at}umn.edu.

The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between monthly Dairy Herd Improvement (DHI) subclinical mastitis and new infection rate estimates and daily bulk tank somatic cell count (SCC) summarized by statistical process control tools. Dairy Herd Improvement Association test-day subclinical mastitis and new infection rate estimates along with daily or every other day bulk tank SCC data were collected for 12 mo of 2003 from 275 Upper Midwest dairy herds. Herds were divided into 5 herd production categories. A linear score [LNS = ln(BTSCC/100,000)/0.693147 + 3] was calculated for each individual bulk tank SCC. For both the raw SCC and the transformed data, the mean and sigma were calculated using the statistical quality control individual measurement and moving range chart procedure of Statistical Analysis System. One hundred eighty-three herds of the 275 herds from the study data set were then randomly selected and the raw (method 1) and transformed (method 2) bulk tank SCC mean and sigma were used to develop models for predicting subclinical mastitis and new infection rate estimates. Herd production category was also included in all models as 5 dummy variables. Models were validated by calculating estimates of subclinical mastitis and new infection rates for the remaining 92 herds and plotting them against observed values of each of the dependents. Only herd production category and bulk tank SCC mean were significant and remained in the final models. High R2 values (0.83 and 0.81 for methods 1 and 2, respectively) indicated a strong correlation between the bulk tank SCC and herd’s subclinical mastitis prevalence. The standard errors of the estimate were 4.02 and 4.28% for methods 1 and 2, respectively, and decreased with increasing herd production. As a case study, Shewhart Individual Measurement Charts were plotted from the bulk tank SCC to identify shifts in mastitis incidence. Four of 5 charts examined signaled a change in bulk tank SCC before the DHI test day identified the change in subclinical mastitis prevalence. It can be concluded that applying statistical process control tools to daily bulk tank SCC can be used to estimate subclinical mastitis prevalence in the herd and observe for change in the subclinical mastitis status. Single DHI test day estimates of new infection rate were insufficient to accurately describe its dynamics.

Key Words: bulk tank somatic cell count • mastitis prevalence • statistical process control

Abbreviation key: BTSCC = bulk tank SCC, Cpk = capability index, HPC = herd production category, LNS = linear score, LNSmean = linear score mean, LNSsigma = linear score sigma, NIR = new infection rate, NIRe = estimated new infection rate, SCCmean = SCC mean, SCCsigma = SCC sigma, SM = subclinical mastitis prevalence, SMe = estimated subclinical mastitis prevalence, SPC = statistical process control




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
M. E. Davis, T. Parrott, D. C. Brown, B. Z. de Rodas, Z. B. Johnson, C. V. Maxwell, and T. Rehberger
Effect of a Bacillus-based direct-fed microbial feed supplement on growth performance and pen cleaning characteristics of growing-finishing pigs
J Anim Sci, June 1, 2008; 86(6): 1459 - 1467.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. M. Lukas, J. K. Reneau, C. Munoz-Zanzi, and M. L. Kinsel
Predicting Somatic Cell Count Standard Violations Based on Herd's Bulk Tank Somatic Cell Count. Part II: Consistency Index
J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2008; 91(1): 433 - 441.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
N. R. St-Pierre and B. Cobanov
A Model to Determine the Optimal Sampling Schedule of Diet Components
J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2007; 90(12): 5383 - 5394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.