JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Interpretive Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Melin, M.
Right arrow Articles by Wiktorsson, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Melin, M.
Right arrow Articles by Wiktorsson, H.
J. Dairy Sci. 88:3913-3922
© American Dairy Science Association, 2005.

Feeding Patterns and Performance of Cows in Controlled Cow Traffic in Automatic Milking Systems

M. Melin, K. Svennersten-Sjaunja and H. Wiktorsson

Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden

Corresponding author: Martin Melin; e-mail: martin.melin{at}huv.slu.se.

Two groups of dairy cows monitored from 3 to 19 wk postpartum were subjected to 2 different cow traffic routines in an automatic milking system with control gates and an open waiting area. Using different time settings in the control gates, the groups of cows were separated by average milking frequency; cows in the high milking frequency routine had a minimum of 4 h between milkings (MF4) and were milked 3.2 ± 0.1 times daily, whereas cows in the low milking frequency routine had at least 8 h between milkings (MF8) and were milked 2.1 ± 0.1 times daily. Cows in the 2 groups were switched to the opposite milking frequency control for wk 18 and 19. The increased milking frequency resulted in a higher milk yield of about 9% through 16 wk of early lactation Although the higher milk yield was not significant when measured as energy-corrected milk, significant interactions of milking frequency and study period for milk yield and energy-corrected milk yield were consistent with a yield response when cows were milked more frequently. Meal criteria estimated for each individual cow were used to group feeding visits into meals. During MF4, cows fed in fewer meals per day and had longer meals than during MF8. The control gates were used efficiently, with only a few passages not resulting in actual meals. Although the voluntary meal intervals seemed to be short, the average milking frequency was far below that theoretically possible. This was explained by individual differences in milking frequency and long intervals from when a cow was redirected in a control gate until it arrived in the milking unit. A wide individual range in the voluntary interval between the first and the second meal in the milking cycle suggests that fixed time limits for control gates set on group level have no justifiable biological basis. It was also concluded that primiparous cows were well adapted to the automatic milking system after 2 wk in the barn.

Key Words: automatic milking • feeding pattern • individual management • milking frequency

Abbreviation key: AMS = automatic milking system, ECM = energy-corrected milk, G4-8 = treatment group started at the high milking frequency routine and shifted to the lower frequency, G8-4 = treatment group started at the low milking frequency routine and shifted to the higher frequency, ME = metabolizable energy, MF4 = milking frequency routine with a minimum milking interval of 4 h, MF8 = milking frequency routine with a minimum milking interval of 8 h, PP = post-partum




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
A. Bach, M. Devant, C. Igleasias, and A. Ferrer
Forced traffic in automatic milking systems effectively reduces the need to get cows, but alters eating behavior and does not improve milk yield of dairy cattle
J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2009; 92(3): 1272 - 1280.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.