JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Interpretive Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McLaren, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Grexton, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McLaren, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Grexton, B.
J. Dairy Sci. 88:419-425
© American Dairy Science Association, 2005.

The Association of Herd Milk Production and Management with a Return-Over-Feed Index in Ontario Dairy Herds

C. J. McLaren1, K. D. Lissemore1, T. F. Duffield1, K. E. Leslie1, D. F. Kelton1 and B. Grexton2

1 Department of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1
2 The Ontario Dairy Herd Improvement Corporation, 660 Speedvale Avenue, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1K 1E5

Corresponding author: C. McLaren; e-mail: mclarenc{at}uoguelph.ca.

Associations of herd milk production and management variables to a return-over-feed (ROF) herd profit index were examined among 95 dairy farms. The ROF index is derived from 2 important determinants of profit on dairy farms: milk income and feed cost. All producers were participants in the Dairy Herd Improvement (DHI) ROF program in Ontario, Canada during 2002. Nutrition, housing, health, and other management data were collected through a phone survey of herd managers. Herd milk production, milk component percentages, and somatic cell count data were obtained from the Ontario DHI database. The linear regression model accounting for significant variation in ROF with highest R2 (0.66) included standardized milk production, milk protein percentage, milk fat percentage, and use of monensin in lactating cow rations. A 1-kg increase in standardized milk production (kg/d per cow) or a 0.1 percentage unit increase in milk protein was associated with $0.35/d per cow or $0.26/d per cow increase, respectively, in the ROF of the dairy herd. However, a 0.1 percentage unit increase in milk fat was associated with a $0.10/d per cow decrease in ROF, probably because of a negative association of milk fat with milk yield. Use of monensin in lactating cow rations was associated with a $0.39/d per cow increase in ROF. In a separate model (R2 = 0.27) that examined management factors independent of production variables, herds using 3 times daily milking had a $1.25/d per cow higher ROF vs. herds using twice daily, whereas use of an Escherichia coli mastitis vaccine was associated with $0.59/d per cow higher ROF. Production-related variables accounted for more variation in the ROF index than management variables, and the latter, e.g., use of monensin, only marginally increased R2 of production-based regression models.

Key Words: return over feed • milk production • management • economics

Abbreviation key: CRC = controlled-release capsule, ROF = return over feed.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
R. B. Walsh, D. F. Kelton, T. F. Duffield, K. E. Leslie, J. S. Walton, and S. J. LeBlanc
Prevalence and Risk Factors for Postpartum Anovulatory Condition in Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2007; 90(1): 315 - 324.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.