JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Interpretive Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Klaas, I. C.
Right arrow Articles by Tölle, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Klaas, I. C.
Right arrow Articles by Tölle, U.
J. Dairy Sci. 88:128-136
© American Dairy Science Association, 2005.

Cow-Related Risk Factors for Milk Leakage

I. C. Klaas1,2, C. Enevoldsen2, A. K. Ersbøll3 and U. Tölle4

1 Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Animal Health and Welfare, PO Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
2 Department of Clinical Studies, Large Animal Medicine, and
3 Department of Animal Science and Animal Health, Division of Epidemiology, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
4 Landeskontrollverband Schleswig-Holstein e.V., D-24106 Kiel, Germany

Corresponding author: Ilka C. Klaas; e-mail: ilka.klaas{at}agrsci.dk.

Milk leakage in dairy cows is a symptom of impaired teat sphincter function. Milk leakage is related to an increased risk of mastitis in heifers and cows, and causes hygiene problems. The aim of our study was to assess whether teat shape, condition of teat orifice, and peak milk flow rate are risk factors for milk leakage. We conducted a longitudinal observational study in 15 German dairy farms in which cows were maintained in loose housing. The farms were visited monthly at 2 consecutive milkings. During the evening milking, milk flow curves were measured with the LactoCorder. Milk leakage was recorded during the subsequent morning milking, when cows entered the milking parlor. Immediately after detachment of the milking cluster, teat shape, teat end shape, and condition of the teat orifice of cows were assessed between 9 and 100 d in milk (DIM) and during late lactation (>250 DIM). Data from 1600 cows were analyzed. Milk leakage was treated as the binary response variable in a logistic regression model with herd as a random effect. Primiparous cows with high peak milk flow and teat canal protrusion were at greater risk of milk leakage. High peak milk flow rate, short teats, teat canal protrusion, inverted teat ends, and early lactation increased the risk of milk leakage in multiparous cows. Random herd effects accounted for only 10% of the total variation, indicating that the impact of management or other herd-level factors on the occurrence of milk leakage is virtually negligible for practical purposes.

Key Words: milk leakage • teat shape • peak milk flow

Abbreviation key: DevMilk = deviation from the population mean milk yield adjusted for stage of lactation and parity, DevPMF = deviation from the population mean peak milk flow adjusted for stage of lactation and parity, MeanResMilk = mean residual of observed –expected milk yield




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
W. Steeneveld, H. Hogeveen, H. W. Barkema, J. van den Broek, and R. B. M. Huirne
The Influence of Cow Factors on the Incidence of Clinical Mastitis in Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2008; 91(4): 1391 - 1402.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
K. M. Svennersten-Sjaunja and G. Pettersson
Pros and cons of automatic milking in Europe
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2008; 86(13_suppl): 37 - 46.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. Rovai, M. T. Kollmann, and R. M. Bruckmaier
Incontinentia Lactis: Physiology and Anatomy Conducive to Milk Leakage in Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2007; 90(2): 682 - 690.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.