| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Departamento de Producción Animal, E.T.S.I. Agrónomos—Universidad Politécnica, Ciudad Universitaria s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain
Corresponding author: O. González-Recio; e-mail: ogrecio{at}pan.etsia.upm.es.
A data file of 225,085 inseminations and 120,713 lactations from 63,160 Holstein cows was analyzed to obtain female fertility economic value according to number of inseminations per service period (INS). Fertility cost (FCOST) was included in a bioeconomic model, taking into account number of doses of semen, hormonal treatments, fertility culling cost, and delayed milk and calf sales. A profit equation was elaborated to estimate fertility cost and profit according to INS. Fertility in Spanish dairy cattle has worsened >10% over the last 14 yr. Days open have increased by about 15 d, and INS has increased from 1.7 to 2.0. A quadratic relationship was found between FCOST and INS. Similar profitability was estimated for cows who needed one or 2 INS, but when >3 INS were needed, profit decreased by >$205 (US dollars)/yr per cow. Cows that needed more INS had higher milk yield per lactation, but also had a higher culling risk and lower productive life and lifetime production, therefore, lower profit. Calving interval (CI) and INS economic values were, respectively, –$4.90 and –$67.32 (US dollars)/yr per cow and per one unit of change. The economic values of productive traits were $4.04, $1.02, and $1.19 (US dollars)/yr per cow and per one unit of change for kg protein, kg fat, and days in milk, respectively. A mature body weight economic value of –$0.67 (US dollars)/yr per cow and per kg was estimated. The relative importance of fertility traits with respect to protein was 64% for CI and 24% for INS, although the CI economic value is highly influenced by phenotypic standard deviation considered.
Key Words: artificial insemination • fertility cost • profit
Abbreviation key: AFC = age at first calving, CI = calving interval, DFS = days to first insemination, DO = days open, DP = dry period (days), FCOST = fertility cost, INS = number of inseminations per service period, KGM = actual (nonadjusted) milk yield, KGM305 = 305-d adjusted milk yield, NR = nonreturn rate at 56 (NR56) or 90 (NR90) d, RSK = estimated fertility culling risk, SF = success of first insemination
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  Y. Hou, P. Madsen, R. Labouriau, Y. Zhang, M. S. Lund, and G. Su Genetic analysis of days from calving to first insemination and days open in Danish Holsteins using different models and censoring scenarios J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2009; 92(3): 1229 - 1239. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
O. Gonzalez-Recio, E. Lopez de Maturana, and J. P. Gutierrez Inbreeding Depression on Female Fertility and Calving Ease in Spanish Dairy Cattle J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2007; 90(12): 5744 - 5752. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. L. de Maturana, E. Ugarte, and O. Gonzalez-Recio Impact of Calving Ease on Functional Longevity and Herd Amortization Costs in Basque Holsteins Using Survival Analysis J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2007; 90(9): 4451 - 4457. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. M. B. Dematawewa, R. E. Pearson, and P. M. VanRaden Modeling Extended Lactations of Holsteins J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2007; 90(8): 3924 - 3936. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Wolfova, J. Wolf, J. Kvapilik, and J. Kica Selection for Profit in Cattle: I. Economic Weights for Purebred Dairy Cattle in the Czech Republic J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2007; 90(5): 2442 - 2455. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Melendez and P. Pinedo The Association Between Reproductive Performance and Milk Yield in Chilean Holstein Cattle J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2007; 90(1): 184 - 192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
O. Gonzalez-Recio, R. Alenda, Y. M. Chang, K. A. Weigel, and D. Gianola Selection for female fertility using censored fertility traits and investigation of the relationship with milk production. J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2006; 89(11): 4438 - 4444. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. M. Chang, I. M. Andersen-Ranberg, B. Heringstad, D. Gianola, and G. Klemetsdal Bivariate Analysis of Number of Services to Conception and Days Open in Norwegian Red Using a Censored Threshold-Linear Model J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2006; 89(2): 772 - 778. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Hare, H. D. Norman, and J. R. Wright Trends in Calving Ages and Calving Intervals for Dairy Cattle Breeds in the United States J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2006; 89(1): 365 - 370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
O. Gonzalez-Recio, Y. M. Chang, D. Gianola, and K. A. Weigel Number of Inseminations to Conception in Holstein Cows Using Censored Records and Time-Dependent Covariates J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2005; 88(10): 3655 - 3662. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
O. Gonzalez-Recio and R. Alenda Genetic Parameters for Female Fertility Traits and a Fertility Index in Spanish Dairy Cattle J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2005; 88(9): 3282 - 3289. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
