JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Interpretive Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tozer, P. R.
Right arrow Articles by Muller, L. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tozer, P. R.
Right arrow Articles by Muller, L. D.
J. Dairy Sci. 87:2902-2911
© American Dairy Science Association, 2004.

The Effect of Pasture Allowance and Supplementation on Feed Efficiency and Profitability of Dairy Systems{dagger}

P. R. Tozer, F. Bargo and L. D. Muller

Department of Dairy and Animal Science, Pennsylvania State University, University Park 16802

Corresponding author: P. R. Tozer; e-mail: ptozer{at}agric.wa.gov.au.

Partial budgeting was used to compare income over feed costs of high-yielding Holstein cows based on data from an experiment with 4 dietary treatments arranged in a 2 x 2 factorial. The factors were low (25 kg DM/cow per day) and high (40 kg DM/cow per day) pasture allowance (PA) and supplemental grain fed at 1 kg/4 kg of milk or no supplemental grain fed. The 4 treatments were low PA unsupplemented (LPAU), low PA concentrate supplementation (LPAC), high PA unsupplemented (HPAU), and high PA concentrate supplementation (HPAC). Two management systems were modeled. The first, a fixed herd size flexible rotation length model, and the second, a flexible herd size model where rotation length was fixed. The LPAC treatment yielded the highest income over feed costs, followed by the HPAC treatment. The treatment generating the lowest income was the HPAU system. The low PA systems generated more income than did the high PA systems for equivalent supplemental feeding strategies. The results also showed that feeding supplemental grain increased the income-over-feed costs compared with systems that did not feed supplemental grain. In most treatments, comparing the fixed herd against the flexible herd models, the flexible herd size model generated higher income due to the substitution of relatively low income per hectare of hay production for higher income from milk production. There were also differences in feed conversion efficiencies for milk production due to concentrate supplementation (1.04 unsupplemented vs. 1.21 supplemented), but PA did not affect the efficiency of milk production. Neither supplementation nor PA affected the feed conversion efficiency of milk fat yield. However, the efficiency of milk protein yield was affected by concentrate supplementation (0.028 unsupplemented vs. 0.034 supplemented) but not by pasture allowance.

Key Words: grazing • stocking rate • pasture allowance • concentrate supplementation • CS = concentrate supplementation • HPA = high pasture allowance • HPAC = high pasture allowance concentrate supplemented • HPAU = high pasture allowance unsupplemented • IOFC = income over feed costs • LPA = low pasture allowance • LPAC = low pasture allowance concentrate supplemented • LPAU = low pasture allowance unsupplemented • PA = pasture allowance • SR = stocking rate






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.