JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Interpretive Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mark, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mark, T.
J. Dairy Sci. 87:2641-2652
© American Dairy Science Association, 2004.

Applied Genetic Evaluations for Production and Functional Traits in Dairy Cattle

T. Mark

Interbull Centre, Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 75007 Uppsala

E-mail: Thomas.Mark{at}hgen.slu.se.

The objective of this study was to review the current status of genetic evaluation systems for production and functional traits as practiced in different Interbull member countries and to discuss that status in relation to research results and potential improvements. Thirty-one countries provided information. Substantial variation was evident for number of traits considered per country, trait definition, genetic evaluation procedure within trait, effects included, and how these were treated in genetic evaluation models. All countries lacked genetic evaluations for one or more economically important traits. Improvement in the genetic evaluation models, especially for many functional traits, could be achieved by closing the gaps between research and practice. More detailed and up to date information about national genetic evaluation systems for traits in different countries is available at www.interbull.org. Female fertility and workability traits were considered in many countries and could be next in line for international genetic evaluations.

Key Words: Genetic evaluation • functional traits • across-country genetic correlations • variance heterogeneity

Abbreviation key: WHFF = World Holstein Friesian Federation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
S. Loker, F. Miglior, J. Bohmanova, L. R. Schaeffer, J. Jamrozik, and G. Kistemaker
Short communication: Effect of preadjusting test-day yields for stage of pregnancy on variance component estimation in Canadian Ayrshires
J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2009; 92(5): 2270 - 2275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. Haile-Mariam, M. J. Carrick, and M. E. Goddard
Genotype by Environment Interaction for Fertility, Survival, and Milk Production Traits in Australian Dairy Cattle
J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2008; 91(12): 4840 - 4853.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. K. Sorensen, E. Norberg, J. Pedersen, and L. G. Christensen
Invited Review: Crossbreeding in Dairy Cattle: A Danish Perspective
J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2008; 91(11): 4116 - 4128.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. Lassen and T. Mark
Short Communication: Genotype by Housing Interaction for Conformation and Workability Traits in Danish Holsteins
J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2008; 91(11): 4424 - 4428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. J. Haskell, S. Brotherstone, A. B. Lawrence, and I. M. S. White
Characterization of the Dairy Farm Environment in Great Britain and the Effect of the Farm Environment on Cow Life Span
J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2007; 90(11): 5316 - 5323.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
P. Rozzi, F. Miglior, and K. J. Hand
A Total Merit Selection Index for Ontario Organic Dairy Farmers
J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2007; 90(3): 1584 - 1593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
H. M. Nielsen, L. G. Christensen, and J. Odegard
A method to define breeding goals for sustainable dairy cattle production.
J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2006; 89(9): 3615 - 3625.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
H. A. Mulder and P. Bijma
Benefits of Cooperation Between Breeding Programs in the Presence of Genotype by Environment Interaction
J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2006; 89(5): 1727 - 1739.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
H. A. Mulder, R. F. Veerkamp, B. J. Ducro, J. A. M. van Arendonk, and P. Bijma
Optimization of Dairy Cattle Breeding Programs for Different Environments with Genotype by Environment Interaction
J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2006; 89(5): 1740 - 1752.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
T. Strabel, J. Szyda, E. Ptak, and J. Jamrozik
Comparison of Random Regression Test-Day Models for Polish Black and White Cattle
J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2005; 88(10): 3688 - 3699.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. Jamrozik, J. Fatehi, G. J. Kistemaker, and L. R. Schaeffer
Estimates of Genetic Parameters for Canadian Holstein Female Reproduction Traits
J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2005; 88(6): 2199 - 2208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
H. M. Nielsen, L. G. Christensen, and A. F. Groen
Derivation of Sustainable Breeding Goals for Dairy Cattle Using Selection Index Theory
J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2005; 88(5): 1882 - 1890.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.