HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Interpretive Summary Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Spörndly, E. Articles by Wredle, E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Spörndly, E. Articles by Wredle, E.

Automatic Milking and Grazing—Effects of Distance to Pasture and Level of Supplements on Milk Yield and Cow Behavior

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Kungsängen Research Centre, SE-753 23 Uppsala, Sweden

Corresponding author: E. Spörndly; e-mail: Eva.Sporndly{at}huv.slu.se.

In an automatic milking system, 45 cows were divided into groups that grazed on a mixed grass sward (Poa Pratensis and Festuca Pratensis) at different distances from the barn: near pasture (NP) at 50 m between the barn and the pasture and distant pasture (DP) at 260 m between the barn and the pasture. For both of these treatments, 3 kg of dry matter (DM) from supplementary grass silage were offered in the barn. The third treatment group grazed together under the DP treatment but was offered an ad libitum supply of grass silage in the barn (DP + S). Cows were also fed concentrates in relation to requirements (average 7 kg/d per cow). During the period from June 5 to July 13 (Period 1), cows in the NP group had a higher milk yield (29.1 kg) than did cows in the DP group (26.4 kg) and had a higher milking frequency compared with the other groups, 2.5 vs. 2.3 and 2.3 milkings/d, respectively. During August, cows in group DP + S had a lower milking frequency (2.1 milkings/d) compared with the two groups on lower supplementation (2.5 milkings/d). In Period 1, all groups spent approximately 20% of their time grazing, but after mid July groups DP and DP + S decreased the time they spent grazing to around 10%; cows in group NP continued to graze as before. Thus, longer distances to pasture may lead to decreases in milk yield, milking frequency, and grazing time of cows in an automatic milking system. The higher level of silage supplementation (group DP + S) did not result in a significantly higher milk yield compared with herdmates (DP) also grazing the more distant pasture.

Key Words: automatic milking • grazing • behavior • milk production

Abbreviation key: DP = distant pasture, DP + S = DP + ad libitum silage, ECM = energy-corrected milk, ME = metabolizable energy, NP = near pasture

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. M. Svennersten-Sjaunja and G. Pettersson Pros and cons of automatic milking in Europe J Anim Sci, March 1, 2008; 86(13_suppl): 37 - 46. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Speroni, G. Pirlo, and S. Lolli Effect of Automatic Milking Systems on Milk Yield in a Hot Environment J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2006; 89(12): 4687 - 4693. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Sporndly and T. Asberg Eating rate and preference of different concentrate components for cattle. J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2006; 89(6): 2188 - 2199. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Sporndly and E. Wredle Automatic Milking and Grazing--Effects of Location of Drinking Water on Water Intake, Milk Yield, and Cow Behavior J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2005; 88(5): 1711 - 1722. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]