JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vargas, B.
Right arrow Articles by van Arendonk, J. A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vargas, B.
Right arrow Articles by van Arendonk, J. A. M.
J. Dairy Sci. 87:1496-1505
© American Dairy Science Association, 2004.

Genetic Comparison of Breeding Schemes Based on Semen Importation and Local Breeding Schemes: Framework and Application to Costa Rica

B. Vargas1 and J. A. M. van Arendonk2

1 Posgrado Regional en Ciencias Veterinarias Tropicales, Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica, Heredia, Costa Rica
2 Animal Breeding and Genetics Group, Wageningen University, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands

Corresponding author: J. Van Arendonk; E-mail: Johan.vanarendonk{at}wur.nl.

Local breeding schemes for Holstein cattle of Costa Rica were compared with the current practice based on continuous semen importation (SI) by deterministic simulation. Comparison was made on the basis of genetic response and correlation between breeding goals. A local breeding goal was defined on the basis of prevailing production circumstances and compared against a typical breeding goal for an exporting country. Differences in genetic response were <3%, and the correlation between breeding goals was 0.99. Therefore, difference between breeding objectives proved negligible. For the evaluation of genetic response, the current scheme based on SI was evaluated against a progeny testing (PT) scheme and a closed nucleus (CN) breeding scheme, both local. Selection intensities and accuracy of selection were defined according to current population size and reproduction efficiency parameters. When genotype x environment interaction (G x E) was ignored, SI was the strategy with the highest genetic response: 5.0% above the CN breeding scheme and 33.2% above PT. A correlation between breeding values in both countries lower than one was assumed to assess the effect of G x E. This resulted in permanent effects on the relative efficiencies of breeding strategies because of the reduction in the rate of genetic response when SI was used. When the genetic correlation was assumed equal to 0.75, the genetic response achieved with SI was reduced at the same level as local PT. When an initial difference in average genetic merit of the populations was assumed, this only had a temporal effect on the relative ranking of strategies, which is reverted after some years of selection because the rate of change in genetic responses remains unchanged. Given that the actual levels of genetic correlation between countries may be around 0.60, it was concluded that a local breeding scheme based on a nucleus herd could provide better results than the current strategy based on SI.

Key Words: breeding scheme • genetic comparison • dairy cattle

Abbreviation key: CN = closed nucleus, CR = correlated response, ER = economic response, G x E = genotype x environment interaction, PT = progeny testing, SI = semen importation, TPI = total production index




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
H. A. Mulder and P. Bijma
Benefits of Cooperation Between Breeding Programs in the Presence of Genotype by Environment Interaction
J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2006; 89(5): 1727 - 1739.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
H. A. Mulder, R. F. Veerkamp, B. J. Ducro, J. A. M. van Arendonk, and P. Bijma
Optimization of Dairy Cattle Breeding Programs for Different Environments with Genotype by Environment Interaction
J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2006; 89(5): 1740 - 1752.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.