| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1 Animal Breeding and Genetics Group, Wageningen University, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
2 NRS, PO Box 454, 6800 AL Arnhem, The Netherlands
Corresponding author: H. A. Mulder; E-mail: herman.mulder{at}wur.nl.
The objective of this study was to quantify genotype by environment interaction (G x E) between automatic milking systems (AMS) and conventional milking systems (CMS) for test-day milk, fat, and protein yield and for test-day somatic cell score (SCS) in The Netherlands. The G x E was studied in 2 ways: 1) between AMS farms and CMS farms in the same period and 2) within farms comparing the period before introduction of AMS with the period after introduction of AMS. For both sub-objectives, a separate data set was generated. Test-day records were used to be more flexible with respect to the introduction date of AMS. Multivariate, fixed regression, test-day sire models were used to estimate variance components.
Genetic correlations between AMS farms and CMS farms in the same period were 0.93, >0.99, 0.98, and 0.79 for test-day milk yield, fat yield, protein yield, and SCS, respectively. Genetic correlations within farms between the period before and after introduction of AMS were lower for production traits and higher for SCS: 0.89, 0.91, 0.87, and >0.99, respectively, for test-day milk yield, fat yield, protein yield, and SCS. Heterogeneity of variance was observed between AMS and CMS in both data sets. Especially the residual variance increased with automatic milking. As a consequence, the heritability tended to be lower for automatic milking. It was concluded that effects of G x E are small between AMS and CMS. Therefore, AMS farms can select sires accurately based on national rankings.
Key Words: genotype by environment interaction • automatic milking • milk production • somatic cell score
Abbreviation key: AMS = automatic milking system, CMS = conventional milking system, G x E = genotype by environment interaction, HTD = herd-test date
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  H. Hammami, B. Rekik, H. Soyeurt, C. Bastin, J. Stoll, and N. Gengler Genotype x Environment Interaction for Milk Yield in Holsteins Using Luxembourg and Tunisian Populations J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2008; 91(9): 3661 - 3671. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. J. Haskell, S. Brotherstone, A. B. Lawrence, and I. M. S. White Characterization of the Dairy Farm Environment in Great Britain and the Effect of the Farm Environment on Cow Life Span J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2007; 90(11): 5316 - 5323. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. J. Nauta, R. F. Veerkamp, E. W. Brascamp, and H. Bovenhuis Genotype by environment interaction for milk production traits between organic and conventional dairy cattle production in The Netherlands. J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2006; 89(7): 2729 - 2737. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. A. Mulder and P. Bijma Benefits of Cooperation Between Breeding Programs in the Presence of Genotype by Environment Interaction J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2006; 89(5): 1727 - 1739. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. A. Mulder, R. F. Veerkamp, B. J. Ducro, J. A. M. van Arendonk, and P. Bijma Optimization of Dairy Cattle Breeding Programs for Different Environments with Genotype by Environment Interaction J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2006; 89(5): 1740 - 1752. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
