JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rodríguez-Prado, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ferret, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rodríguez-Prado, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ferret, A.
J. Dairy Sci. 87:1413-1424
© American Dairy Science Association, 2004.

Effects of Fiber Content and Particle Size of Forage on the Flow of Microbial Amino Acids from Continuous Culture Fermenters*

M. Rodríguez-Prado, S. Calsamiglia and A. Ferret

Departament de Ciència Animal i dels Aliments, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. 08193 Bellaterra, Spain

Corresponding author: S. Calsamiglia; e-mail: sergio.calsamiglia{at}uab.es.

Eight dual-flow continuous culture fermenters (1320 mL) were used in two 10-d consecutive periods to study the effects of fiber content and particle size on rumen fermentation, nutrient flow, and the profile and flow of amino acids (AA) from microbial origin. Treatments were arranged in a 2 x 2 factorial; the main factors were fiber content (high fiber [HF] = 67% alfalfa hay, 33% concentrate; low fiber [LF] = 39% alfalfa hay, 61% concentrate) and forage stem particle size (ground not to pass a 3-mm sieve = large size [LS]; ground to pass a 1-mm sieve = small size [SS]). On the last day of the experiment, liquid- (LAB) and solid- (SAB) associated bacteria were isolated from each fermenter for chemical analysis. Microbial N and AA flows were estimated using LAB or SAB composition data. Total volatile fatty acid concentration was higher for LF (122 mM) than for HF (102 mM). The proportion of acetate was higher for HF (63.5%) than for LF (58.2%). When SS was fed instead of LS, there was a reduction in the acetate proportion (63.4% vs 58.3%, respectively) and in the acetate to propionate ratio (3.13 vs. 2.41, respectively). Bacterial N flow was higher, and dietary N flow was lower, in SS compared with LS when LAB were used for calculations. Efficiency of microbial protein synthesis (EMPS) was affected by particle size, when LAB were used for calculations, and by fiber content, when SAB were used for calculations. The AA profile of LAB differed from SAB in 4 of 16 AA. The fiber content and particle size had small effects on microbial AA profile. However, the bacterial AA flow was higher in 13 of 16 AA, when SAB instead of LAB were used for calculations. Estimates of bacterial N flow, EMPS, AA profile, and flows of microbial origin were dependent on the type of microbial population used for calculations. The representativeness of the microbial samples is essential for the accurate prediction of the AA flow from microbial origin.

Key Words: fiber • particle size • amino acid • rumen bacteria

Abbreviation key: EAA = essential AA, EMPS = efficiency of microbial protein synthesis, HF = high fiber, LAB = liquid-associated bacteria, LF = low fiber, LS = large size, NEAA = non-essential AA, SAB = solid-associated bacteria, SS = small size




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. Boguhn, H. Kluth, and M. Rodehutscord
Effect of Total Mixed Ration Composition on Amino Acid Profiles of Different Fractions of Ruminal Microbes In Vitro
J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2006; 89(5): 1592 - 1603.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. L. Firkins, A. N. Hristov, M. B. Hall, G. A. Varga, and N. R. St-Pierre
Integration of Ruminal Metabolism in Dairy Cattle
J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2006; 89(e_suppl_1): E31 - E51.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.